...
首页> 外文期刊>The journal of criminal law >Truth v justice: judicial stay of criminal proceedings due to principles of justice and fairness-an Israeli development to a British rule
【24h】

Truth v justice: judicial stay of criminal proceedings due to principles of justice and fairness-an Israeli development to a British rule

机译:真相与正义:由于正义与公平的原则而对刑事诉讼程序的司法中止-以色列对英国统治的发展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Under British law, the court has the inherent authority to set aside an indictment which, under the circumstances of the case, constitutes 'abuse' of the defendant. This unwritten rule had been accepted also by Israeli courts, and then came a completely new, not to say surprising, Act in 2007. The Israeli Parliament (the Knesset) has thereby recognised a preliminary argument which exploits concepts of 'justice' and 'legal fairness', and the granting of pro-discretion to the court, which may decide whether or not it is fitting and proper to conduct the trial against the defendant. How has the court reacted to that? As I will try to emphasise, judicial review upon prosecutorial discretion is rare, just a drop in the bucket, and the court is quite reluctant to implement the new tool.
机译:根据英国法律,法院有固有的权力搁置起诉书,该起诉书在本案情节中构成对被告的“滥用”。以色列法院也接受了这一不成文的规则,随后又出台了一个全新的,毫不奇怪的法案,该法案于2007年出炉。以色列议会(以色列议会)因此承认了利用“正义”和“合法”概念的初步论点。公平性”,以及授予法院自由裁量权,这可能会决定对被告进行审判是否适当和适当。法院对此有何反应?正如我将要强调的那样,对检察权进行司法审查的情况很少见,只是杯水车薪,而法院也不愿实施这一新工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号