首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >Two kinds of small? The 'EU core' in Slovak and Czech geopolitical imagination
【24h】

Two kinds of small? The 'EU core' in Slovak and Czech geopolitical imagination

机译:两种小?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article critically examines Czech and Slovak discourses on the so-called 'core' of the European Union. It argues that despite their similarities as small Central European states, Slovakia and the Czech Republic exhibit significant differences in how the geopolitical imagination of their political establishments re-presents the countries' position in the center-periphery relations. The article does a two-step analysis. First, it discusses the cultural roots of the contemporary geopolitical imaginaries, tracing them back to formative periods of national history. Then, it analyzes present day establishment discourses on the 'EU core', concluding that the Czech foreign policy debate demonstrates a much stronger tendency towards deliberate self-marginalization and is characterized by competing securitization discourses, one of which warns of the danger of marginalization outside of the 'core' while the other attempts to securitize European and German 'hegemony'. The Slovak discourse, on the other hand, is characterized by an underlying constitutive fear of the Self, related to past experiences of anti-Western authoritarianism. This stimulates a much more Euroenthusiast Slovak attitude towards the 'core'. The article contributes to the social constructivist debate by arguing that small states can display different attitudes towards European integration based on their identities and historical experiences.
机译:这篇文章严格审查了捷克和斯洛伐克关于欧盟“核心”的论述。它认为,尽管斯洛伐克和捷克共和国与中小欧洲国家相似,但它们在政治场所的地缘政治想象力如何重述了该国在中部-周边关系中的地位,却表现出显着差异。本文进行了两步分析。首先,它讨论了当代地缘政治假想的文化根源,并将其追溯到国家历史的形成时期。然后,它分析了有关“欧盟核心”的当今建立论断,得出结论,捷克外交政策辩论显示出有更多的蓄意自我边缘化趋势,并且具有竞争性证券化论断的特征,其中之一警告外部存在边缘化的危险另一个试图将欧洲和德国的“霸权”证券化的方案。另一方面,斯洛伐克话语的特征是对自我的潜在构成上的恐惧,这与反西方威权主义的过去经历有关。这激发了Euroenthusiast斯洛伐克对“核心”的态度。文章认为小国可以根据其身份和历史经验对欧洲一体化表现出不同的态度,从而为社会建构主义辩论做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号