首页> 外文期刊>Journal of contemporary European studies >The Routledge handbook of East European politics
【24h】

The Routledge handbook of East European politics

机译:Routledge东欧政治手册

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Following the end of the Cold War, East European politics has been subject to renewed scholarly interest. The opportunities for institutional development, state-building and democratic experimentation have largely fascinated those interested in Central and Eastern European (CEECs) and post-soviet countries. The rich variation in terms of regime types, political parties and cultural norms, as well as the interaction of CEECs with the European community has been part of increasing scholarly focus. Nevertheless, the adherence of most CEECs to NATO and the European Union (EU), allegedly, ended a chapter of their transition period. Despite this, following their integration in these 'transformative' structures, a specific set of issues have (re)emerged in the area ranging from a high contestation of Western liberal norms to an unwinding of previous democratic reforms and institu-tionalisation processes. Recent 'illiberal' developments (Dawson and Hanley 2016) or issues of 'democratic backsliding' (Kelemen and Blauberger 2017) have shocked most political and media pundits. Academically, the region still remains a puzzling area for theoretical investigation and a laboratory for diverse and contrasting empirical findings.
机译:冷战结束后,东欧政治受到了新的学术关注。体制发展,国家建设和民主试验的机会在很大程度上吸引了那些对中欧和东欧(CEEC)以及后苏联国家感兴趣的人。在政体类型,政党和文化规范以及CEEC与欧洲共同体之间的互动方面的丰富差异已成为越来越多的学术关注的一部分。然而,据称大多数CEEC加入北约和欧洲联盟(EU)结束了其过渡时期的一章。尽管如此,随着它们融入这些“变革性”结构中,一系列特定问题(重新)出现了,从西方自由主义规范的激烈争论到先前民主改革和制度化进程的缓和。最近的“自由”发展(Dawson和Hanley,2016年)或“民主倒退”的问题(Kelemen和Blauberger,2017年)震惊了大多数政治和媒体专家。在学术上,该地区仍然是一个令人费解的领域,需要进行理论研究,并需要一个实验室来收集各种不同的经验结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号