首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Contaminant Hydrology >Comments on 'validation of two innovative methods to measure contaminant mass flux in groundwater' by Goltz et al
【24h】

Comments on 'validation of two innovative methods to measure contaminant mass flux in groundwater' by Goltz et al

机译:Goltz等人对“两种测量地下水污染物质量通量的创新方法的验证”的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

I wish to comment on the paper published by Goltz et al. on this journal, titled Validation of two innovative methods to measure contaminant mass flux in groundwater (Goltz et al., 2009). The paper presents the results of experiments Goltz et al. conducted on an artificial aquifer for the purpose of validating two recently developed methods to measure contaminant mass flux in groundwater, the tandem circulation well (TCW) method and the modified integral pumping test (MIPT) method. Their experiment results showed that the TCW method implemented using both the multi-dipole technique and the tracer test technique successfully estimated the mass fluxes with respective accuracies within 2% and 16% of the known values. The MIPT method, on the other hand, underestimated the mass flux by as much as 70%. My comments focus on the MIPT method.
机译:我想对Goltz等人发表的论文发表评论。该期刊的标题为“验证两种测量地下水污染物质量通量的创新方法的验证”(Goltz等,2009)。本文介绍了实验结果Goltz等。为了验证两种最新开发的测量地下水中污染物质量通量的方法,串联循环井(TCW)方法和改进的整体抽水试验(MIPT)方法,对人工含水层进行了验证。他们的实验结果表明,使用多偶极技术和示踪剂测试技术实施的TCW方法成功地估计了质量通量,其各自的准确度在已知值的2%和16%之内。另一方面,MIPT方法将质量通量低估了多达70%。我的评论集中在MIPT方法上。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Contaminant Hydrology》 |2014年第12期|81-82|共2页
  • 作者

    Kerang Sun;

  • 作者单位

    CH2M HILL Inc., 6 Hutton Center Drive, Suite 700, Santa Ana, CA 92707, USA;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);美国《生物学医学文摘》(MEDLINE);美国《化学文摘》(CA);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号