首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Computer Assisted Learning >Promoting case indexing in case library learning: Effects of indexing prompts on self-explanation and problem solving
【24h】

Promoting case indexing in case library learning: Effects of indexing prompts on self-explanation and problem solving

机译:促进案例索引,以便文库学习:索引提示对自我解释和问题解决的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In case library learning, an instructional method that promotes case-based problem solving, learners often struggle with indexing cases. Poor case indexing may hamper retention and retrieval of cases, hindering the construction of mental libraries in learners. To address this issue, the authors developed two indexing prompt types, explanation-based and difference-based, and explored their effects on self-explanation and problem solving in case libraries. A total of 105 students across three sections of a career development course participated in the study. Each section was assigned to one of three conditions: explanation-based indexing, difference-based indexing and no indexing prompt. Both indexing prompts facilitated self-explanation, which elaborated corresponding aspects of cases on which the prompts mainly focused. In arguing for a solution, learners relied more heavily on domain knowledge regardless of prompt types. However, both indexing prompt groups outperformed the control group in rebuttals. The authors discussed the theoretical and practical implications of the study.Lay DescriptionWhat is already known about this topicImplications for practice and/or policyWhat this paper addsA case library learning is a favorable learning environment that delivers authentic decision-making problems and facilitates argumentation skill acquisition.Learners often struggle with indexing cases without sufficient guidance, and subsequently, have difficulties in retrieving and reusing the cases to solve problems.Promoting high-quality self-explanations has been proved effective in learning from cases and improving subsequent problem-solving.Indexing prompts that direct learner's attention to either anomalous or different features between cases can foster self-explanations that elaborate the corresponding aspects of cases on which the prompts focused.Learners in case libraries tend to rely more heavily on domain knowledge they could gain from instructional materials than direct lessons from the cases.Learners who engage in indexing cases with prompts can construct their argumentation better by rebutting well for their contentions.Prompting self-explanations on anomalies, differences, or similarities between cases can maximize the benefits of case-based learning environments.ICase libraries will demonstrate the full potential when learning materials that contain domain knowledge related to the case lessons are incorporated into the case libraries.
机译:如果库学习,促进基于案例的解决问题的教学方法,学习者往往与索引案例斗争。不良案例索引可能会妨碍保留和检索案件,妨碍学习者心理图书馆的建设。为了解决这个问题,作者开发了两个索引提示类型,基于解释和基于差异的,并探讨了在案例库中的自我解释和解决问题的影响。共有105名职业发展课程的三个部分参加了该研究。每个部分都被分配到三个条件之一:基于解释的索引,基于差异的索引,没有索引提示。索引提示促进了自我解释,这阐述了案件的相应方面,提示主要集中在一起。在争论解决方案时,无论提示类型如何,学习者都依赖域名知识。但是,索引提示组都占据了反驳中的对照组。作者讨论了该研究的理论和实践意义.Lay描述已经了解了本文和/或策略的本文案例库学习的练习和/或政策的这个话题是一个有利的学习环境,可提供真实的决策问题,并促进论证技能获取。学习者经常与索引案例斗争而没有足够的指导,随后,在检索和重用案件中有困难解决问题,以解决问题。在从案例中学习和改善后续问题的提高时,已经有效地证明了高质量的自我解释。引起的提示直接学习者对案件之间的异常或不同特征的注意力可以促进详细阐述案例的相应方面的自我解释,其中案例库中的案例图书馆倾向于更依赖于域知识,他们可以从教学材料获得的域名知识而不是直接课程来自与提示进行索引案件的案件可以通过对其争议进行逆转来说更好地构建他们的论证。突破对异常,差异或案件之间的相似性的自我解释,可以最大限度地提高案例的学习环境。酶库将展示在包含与案例课程相关的域知识的学习材料的充分潜力纳入案例库中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号