首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Competition Law and Economics >JUDICIAL CONTROL OF LOCAL PROTECTIONISM IN CHINA: ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AGAINST ADMINISTRATIVE MONOPOLY ON THE SUPREME PEOPLE's COURT
【24h】

JUDICIAL CONTROL OF LOCAL PROTECTIONISM IN CHINA: ANTITRUST ENFORCEMENT AGAINST ADMINISTRATIVE MONOPOLY ON THE SUPREME PEOPLE's COURT

机译:中国地方保护主义的司法控制:最高人民法院对行政垄断的反抗

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article studies the rise of judicial review of local administrative monopolies in contemporary China. Anticompetitive abuses of power by local party-states, driven by corruption, have shaken the very foundations of the country's administrative unity and market efficiency. The entrenched skepticism of the authoritarian party-state toward legal institutions notwithstanding, the Supreme People's Court in Beijing has over the past decade steadily aggrandized its own and local courts' authority to constrain regional protectionist, collusive fiefdoms in ways unforeseen by the drafters of the landmark Anti-Monopoly Law; returning incremental but genuine benefits to the central party-state, whose tacit acquiescence in judicial empowerment has over time transformed into express approval. However, given that administrative monopoly is instinct in a Leninist polity, the central party-state and the Court should have few incentives to eradicate local protectionism once and for all. All things being equal, full-fledged, independent judicial review of administrative monopoly will not emerge in China.
机译:本文研究了当代中国对地方行政垄断的司法审查的兴起。在腐败的驱使下,地方政党的反竞争滥用权力已经动摇了该国行政统一和市场效率的基础。尽管专制政党国家对法制机构根深蒂固的怀疑,但在过去的十年中,北京最高人民法院稳步加强了自己和地方法院的权力,以地标的起草者无法预见的方式约束地区保护主义,合谋主义的封建制。反垄断法;向中央政党国家返还增量但真正的好处,随着时间的推移,默许默许的司法授权已转变为明确认可。但是,考虑到行政垄断是列宁主义政体的本能,中央党国和法院应该没有什么动机一劳永逸地根除地方保护主义。在所有条件平等的情况下,对行政垄断的全面,独立的司法审查不会在中国出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号