首页> 外文期刊>Journal of communication inquiry >The General, the Watchman, and the Engineer of Control: The Relationship Between Cooperation, Communication, and Command in the Society of Control
【24h】

The General, the Watchman, and the Engineer of Control: The Relationship Between Cooperation, Communication, and Command in the Society of Control

机译:将军,值班人员和控制工程师:控制社会中的合作,沟通和指挥之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Taking cue from the Marxian analysis of the relationship between cooperation and capitalist command in Capital and the Grundrisse, the article reviews how Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri have addressed this matter. Drawing from the notorious fragment of the Grundrisse on the general intellect, Hardt and Negri argue that in post-industrial societies the production of value tends to coincide with the ensemble of social activities. Hardt and Negri maintain that since any social activity is potentially a value-generating practice, the capitalist organization of labor is increasingly parasitical and external to the social bios. From this flows that labor can no longer be measured in abstract units of time and the exploitation of living labor leaves way to the expropriation of the common. The second part of the article challenges Hardt and Negri's idealized view of the common by arguing that in the society of control communication and cooperation are always affected and tinged by the media that enable them-the vast majority of which are owned by private corporations. Neither the general in Marx's Capital who organizes the workers from above nor the watchman and regulator of the Grundrisse, the contemporary engineer of control deploys micro-mechanisms of control inside the digital networks that modulate social cooperation. Drawing from Andrejevic's notion of the "digital enclosure" and Terranova's analysis of subjectification in the societies of control, the article concludes with a reflection on post-consensual forms of cooperation that cannot be integrated without igniting a catastrophic transformation of the system.
机译:马克思从《资本论》和《资本主义》中的合作与资本主义命令之间的关系的马克思主义分析中得出的线索,回顾了迈克尔·哈特和安东尼奥·内格里如何解决这一问题。哈特和内格里从“基本知识”中臭名昭著的碎片中汲取了教训,认为在后工业社会中,价值的产生往往与社会活动的整体同时发生。哈特和内格里坚持认为,由于任何社会活动​​都可能是一种创造价值的做法,资本主义劳动组织越来越被寄生在社会生物的外部。从这种流动来看,劳动不再可以用抽象的时间单位来衡量,对活着劳动的剥削为剥夺普通人铺平了道路。文章的第二部分通过争辩说,在控制社会中,沟通与合作总是受到使他们变得有利的媒体的影响和色彩,挑战了哈特和内格里对共同体的理想化观点,而媒体的交流和合作则始终由它们所主导,而媒体大部分是由私人公司拥有的。既不是马克思首都的将军组织从上层来的工人,也不是守望者和格伦德里斯的监管者,当代的控制工程师都无法在控制社会合作的数字网络内部部署控制的微观机制。借鉴安德烈耶维奇(Andrejevic)的“数字围护”概念以及Terranova在控制社会中对主体性的分析,得出的结论是对共识后的合作形式的反思,这种形式的合作如果不点燃系统的灾难性转变就无法整合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号