首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Clinical Pathology >Comparison of the novel quantitative ARMS assay and an enriched PCR-ASO assay for K-ras mutations with conventional cytology on endobiliary brush cytology from 312 consecutive extrahepatic biliary stenoses
【24h】

Comparison of the novel quantitative ARMS assay and an enriched PCR-ASO assay for K-ras mutations with conventional cytology on endobiliary brush cytology from 312 consecutive extrahepatic biliary stenoses

机译:新颖的定量ARMS测定法和丰富的PCR-ASO测定法对312种连续肝外胆管狭窄的常规K-ras胆管刷细胞学与传统细胞学的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Extrahepatic biliary stenosis (EBS) has malignant and benign causes. Patients with EBS are at risk of having or developing malignancy. Accurate diagnostic tests for early detection and surveillance are needed. The sensitivity of biliary cytology for malignancy is low. K-ras mutation analysis on brush cytology is a valuable adjunct, but specificity is low. A quantitative test for K-ras mutations has been developed: the amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS). Aim: To assess the test characteristics and additional value of ARMS in diagnosing the cause of EBS. Methods: Brush samples from endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were collected from 312 patients with EBS. K-ras mutation analysis was performed using ARMS—allele specific amplification was coupled with real time fluorescent detection of PCR products. Results were compared with conventional cytology and K-ras mutation analysis using allele specific oligonucleotide (ASO) hybridisation, and evaluated in view of the final diagnosis. Results: The test characteristics of ARMS and ASO largely agreed. Sensitivity for detecting malignancy was 49% and 42%, specificity 93% and 88%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 96% and 91%, respectively. The sensitivity of ARMS and cytology combined was 71%, and PPV was 93%. The specificity of ARMS could be increased to 100% by setting limits for the false positives, but reduced sensitivity from 49% to 43%. Conclusions: ARMS can be considered supplementary to conventional cytology, and comparable to ASO in diagnosing malignant EBS. A specificity of 100% can be achieved with ARMS, which should be considered in the surveillance of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer.
机译:背景:肝外胆管狭窄(EBS)具有恶性和良性原因。 EBS患者有罹患或发展为恶性肿瘤的风险。需要针对早期检测和监视的准确诊断测试。胆道细胞学检查对恶性肿瘤的敏感性较低。刷细胞学的K-ras突变分析是有价值的辅助手段,但特异性较低。已经开发了针对K-ras突变的定量测试:扩增难治性突变系统(ARMS)。目的:评估ARMS在诊断EBS原因时的测试特性和附加价值。方法:从312例EBS患者中收集内镜逆行胰胆管造影的刷样品。使用ARMS进行K-ras突变分析-等位基因特异性扩增与PCR产物的实时荧光检测相结合。将结果与使用等位基因特异性寡核苷酸(ASO)杂交的常规细胞学和K-ras突变分析进行比较,并根据最终诊断进行评估。结果:ARMS和ASO的测试特性基本一致。检测恶性肿瘤的敏感性分别为49%和42%,特异性为93%和88%,阳性预测值(PPV)为96%和91%。 ARMS和细胞学检查相结合的敏感性为71%,PPV为93%。通过设置假阳性的限度,可以将ARMS的特异性提高到100%,但是将敏感性从49%降低到43%。结论:ARMS可被认为是常规细胞学的补充,在诊断恶性EBS方面可与ASO媲美。使用ARMS可以达到100%的特异性,在监测有胰腺癌风险的患者时应考虑到这一点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号