首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Eco-labelling Of Wild-caught Seafood Products
【24h】

Eco-labelling Of Wild-caught Seafood Products

机译:野生海产品的生态标签

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Several eco-labels for wild-caught seafood have been developed during the last decade.This article describes and analyses the criteria applied by four different eco-labelling schemes for seafood products from capture fisheries,and discusses the criteria in terms of environmental impacts,based on the ISO 14040 standard for life cycle assessment. It is concluded that the most widespread eco-label,the Marine Stewardship Council (MSC),mainly addresses the fishing stage,in particular the overexploitation of marine resources.LCA studies confirm that the fishing stage represents the most significant environmental burden,but energy consumption and emissions of anti-fouling agents at the fishing or harvesting stage contribute with significant impacts that are not being addressed by international labelling initiatives for wild-caught seafood.LCA studies show that significant environmental impacts are related to the life cycle stages after landing.This includes fish processing,transport,cooling and packaging (especially for highly processed seafood products).Hence,another challenge would be to include criteria related to the post-landing consumption of energy,certain materials and chemicals,waste handling and wastewater emissions.Minimizing product losses throughout the product chain would also be an important area for future criteria in order to avoid fishing at high environmental costs only to produce something that is later wasted.The analysis shows that the Swedish KRAV is the only one that currently addresses a range of issues that include energy and chemicals in the whole life cycle of the products.International initiatives such as MSC cover fish products from many parts of the world emphasizing 'overexploitation of fish resources'.It is recommended,however,that international initiatives such as MSC develop criteria related to energy use and chemicals - at least at the fishing stage.Over time,other life cycle stages could be addressed as well to the extent that this is manageable.
机译:在过去的十年中,已经开发了几种野生捕捞海鲜的生态标签。本文介绍并分析了四种不同的生态标签计划对捕捞渔业海鲜产品应用的标准,并根据环境影响对标准进行了讨论。符合ISO 14040生命周期评估标准。结论是,最广泛的生态标签是海洋管理委员会(MSC),主要涉及捕捞阶段,特别是海洋资源的过度开发。LCA研究证实,捕捞阶段代表了最大的环境负担,但消耗了能源捕捞或收获阶段防污剂的排放和排污剂的排放产生了重大影响,国际野生海产品标签计划并未解决这些影响.LCA研究表明,重大环境影响与着陆后的生命周期阶段有关。包括鱼类加工,运输,冷却和包装(尤其是高度加工的海产品)。因此,另一个挑战将是包括与登陆后能源消耗,某些材料和化学药品,废物处理和废水排放有关的标准。整个产品链中的损失也将是未来标准的重要领域为了避免以高昂的环境成本捕鱼,只会生产出后来被浪费掉的东西。分析表明,瑞典的KRAV是目前唯一解决一系列问题的产品,包括产品整个生命周期中的能源和化学物质。诸如MSC之类的国际倡议涵盖了来自世界许多地方的鱼产品,强调了“鱼类资源的过度开发”。但是,建议诸如MSC之类的国际倡议至少在捕捞阶段就制定与能源使用和化学品有关的标准。随着时间的流逝,其他生命周期阶段也可以在可管理的范围内解决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号