...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Life cycle environmental impacts of compressed biogas production through anaerobic digestion of manure and municipal organic waste
【24h】

Life cycle environmental impacts of compressed biogas production through anaerobic digestion of manure and municipal organic waste

机译:压缩沼气生产通过粪肥和市政有机废弃物的压缩沼气产生的生命周期环境影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Compressed biogas (CBG) has proven to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to fossil diesel, but due to diverging methodologies, results of different studies lie far apart. The usage of the co produced digestate can lead to high acidification and eutrophication impacts, but this aspect is often not considered, neither is the way different substitution methods for the digestate affect the results. In this work we address these issues performing a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of CBG production through anaerobic digestion of animal manure and municipal organic waste (MOW). GHG savings of 93%e131% compared to the fossil diesel benchmark in the Renewable Energy Directive were found, thus complying with the 60% reduction target. The ammonia emissions during the digestate application make acidifi-cation and terrestrial eutrophication the main environmental burdens of CBG from MOW, leading to a 142% and a 715% increase for acidification and terrestrial eutrophication respectively, compared to fossil diesel. When CBG is produced from manure and the avoidance of manure storage emission is considered, a 257% and a 700% lower acidification and terrestrial eutrophication impact was found. Our results suggest that better manure-storage techniques are required and that field emissions due to digestate application, which is sensitive to pH and nitrogen content, should be reduced. It was further demonstrated that including the digestate fertilizing emissions in the system boundaries of the LCA of CBG production and substitution of both mineral fertilizer production and usage have a great impact on the outcome, but also introduce uncertainty of the results. The outcome of this work was used to suggest recommendations on the methodology for future LCA studies on CBG production and EU biofuel regulations. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:与化石柴油相比,压缩的沼气(CBG)已被证明是为了减少温室气体(GHG)排放,但由于发散方法,不同的研究结果较远。 CO产生的消化物的用途可导致高酸化和富营养化影响,但是通常不考虑该方面,也不是消化的不同替代方法影响结果的方式。在这项工作中,我们通过厌氧消化动物粪和市政有机废物(割草)来解决CBG产量的生命周期评估(LCA)的这些问题。找到了与可再生能源指令中的化石柴油基准相比为93%E131%的GHG节省,因此符合60%的减少目标。消化施用期间的氨排放使酸性阳离子和陆地富营养化成为割草中CBG的主要环境负担,与化石柴油相比,酸化和陆地富营养化的增加142%和715%。当CBG由粪便产生并且考虑避免粪便储存排放时,发现了257%和700%的酸化和陆地富营养化影响。我们的研究结果表明,需要更好的粪便储存技术,并且应减少对pH和氮含量敏感的消化施用引起的现场排放。进一步证明了包括在CBG生产和矿物肥料生产的LCA的系统界限中消化施肥排放,对矿物肥料生产和使用产生了很大影响,但也引入了结果的不确定性。这项工作的结果用于建议关于未来LCA研究关于CBG生产和欧盟生物燃料法规的方法的建议。 (c)2021 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号