...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Investigation of cementitious properties of different constituents in municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash as supplementary cementitious materials
【24h】

Investigation of cementitious properties of different constituents in municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash as supplementary cementitious materials

机译:城市固体废物焚烧底灰不同成分的水泥性能研究辅助胶凝材料

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To investigate the municipal solid waste (MSW) incineration bottom ash (IBA) as a value-added building material, this study focuses on evaluating different IBA constituents (such as glass, ceramic, mineral, slag-I with low-ferrous sintered phase and slag-II with high ferrous sintered phase) to be used as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) and then comparing to commercial SCMs (ground-granulated blast-furnace slag-GGBS and fly ash-FA).The investigated IBA constituents were milled into powder and then used as SCMs to partially replace cement in mortars. Their influences on cement hydration were evaluated by an isothermal calorimeter and the pozzolanic activities were assessed through the modified Chapelle test. The strength development of the mortars was studied to quantify their contributions as SCMs when compared to that of GGBS and FA. The microstructure of the hydrated mortar with IBA constituents was further evaluated.The experimental results showed that, at an early age of the IBA blended cement hydration, the powdered IBA constituents contributed to an increase in heat release, which was higher than that of FA and lower than that of GGBS; and the formation of monosulphate was accelerated. After 90 days' curing, the powdered glass and ceramic fractions derived from IBA contributed significantly to the mortar strength compared to other constituents, indicating their relatively high reactivity that was confirmed by their high consumption of portlandite in the modified Chapelle test. The samples prepared with glass and ceramic powders derived from IBA had a relatively higher efficiency strength index (ESIt, FA/GGBS) than other IBA constituents, indicating their higher potential to be used as SCM alternatives.Therefore, it is suggested that the ground ceramic and glass fractions separated from IBA can be used as SCM alternatives, which can achieve over 80% and over 93% ESI of that of FA and GGBS, respectively. Furthermore, the other fractions of IBA, namely the coarse IBA and IBA-minerals can only be used as fillers. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:为了调查城市固体废物(MSW)焚烧底灰(IBA)作为增值建筑材料,本研究重点是评估不同的IBA成分(如玻璃,陶瓷,矿物质,渣Ib,具有低金属烧结相的具有高亚铁烧结相的Slag-II)用作补充水泥材料(SCM),然后与商业SCM(地粒性高炉炉渣-GGB和Fly Ash-Fa)进行比较。研究的IBA成分被研磨成粉末然后用作SCM以部分替代迫击炮中的水泥。它们对水泥水合的影响是通过等温热量计评估的,通过改性的小柱试验评估了火山灰活性。研究了迫击炮的力量发展,与GGBS和FA相比,将其作为SCM的贡献量化。进一步评估了具有IBA成分的水合砂浆的微观结构。实验结果表明,在IBA混合水泥水合的早期,粉末状IBA成分导致热释放的增加,其高于FA和FA低于GGB;并加速了单硫酸盐的形成。在90天的固化后,与其他成分相比,从IBA衍生自IBA的粉末状玻璃和陶瓷级分,表明其在改良的小教堂试验中,它们的高度消耗量证实了它们的相对高的反应性。用IBA衍生自IBA的玻璃和陶瓷粉末制备的样品比其他IBA成分具有相对较高的效率强度指数(eSIT,FA / GGB),表明其较高的用作SCM替代的潜力。因此,建议地面陶瓷与IBA分离的玻璃级分可以用作SCM替代品,其可以分别达到FA和GGBS的80%和超过93%ESI。此外,IBA的其他级分,即粗IBA和IBA-矿物质只能用作填料。 (c)2020 elestvier有限公司保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号