首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools
【24h】

The emissions reduction effect and technical progress effect of environmental regulation policy tools

机译:环境法规政策工具的减排效果和技术进步效果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

How to set out the provisions that ensure emissions reduction and technical progress in environmental regulation is very important for both China's future emissions reduction and sustainable development. The paper uses statistical data from 30 Chinese provinces from 1997 to 2014 and empirically tests the effects of different types of environmental policies and regulations on emissions reduction and technical progress by using dynamic spatial panel models. The results of spatial autocorrelation tests show that there are both significant positive global autocorrelation and local spatial agglomeration effects relating to pollutant emissions and technical progress. Dynamic spatial panel models indicate that command and control regulations (CCR) are conducive to emissions reduction, but their effects on technical progress are not significant. Market based regulations (MBR) are conducive to technical progress, but their effects on the reduction of emissions are relatively weak. There is a significant inverted-U relationship between economic development level and carbon emissions, validating the EKC hypothesis in China, but the effects of foreign direct investment on carbon reduction and technical progress are not significant. The paper recommends that China should optimize a combination of environmental regulations so as to achieve the win-win outcome of both emissions reduction and technical progress. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:如何制定确保减排和环境法规技术进步的规定,对于中国未来的减排和可持续发展都非常重要。本文使用了1997年至2014年中国30个省的统计数据,并通过动态空间面板模型对不同类型的环境政策法规对减排和技术进步的影响进行了实证检验。空间自相关测试的结果表明,与污染物排放和技术进步相关的全局自相关和局部空间集聚效应均显着。动态空间面板模型表明,命令和控制规则(CCR)有助于减少排放,但是它们对技术进步的影响并不显着。基于市场的法规(MBR)有利于技术进步,但是它们对减少排放的影响相对较弱。经济发展水平和碳排放之间存在显着的倒U型关系,这证实了中国的EKC假设,但外国直接投资对碳减排和技术进步的影响并不显着。本文建议中国优化环境法规的组合,以实现减排和技术进步的双赢结果。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号