...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: Additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming
【24h】

Environmental modelling of aluminium based components manufacturing routes: Additive manufacturing versus machining versus forming

机译:铝基零件制造路线的环境建模:增材制造,机械加工和成型

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Additive Manufacturing represents, by now, a viable alternative for metal-based components production. Therefore the designer, often, has to select among three options at process design stage: subtractive, mass conserving, and additive approaches. The selection of a given process, besides affecting the manufacturing step impact, influences significantly the impact related to the material production step. If the process enables a part weight reduction (as the Additive Manufacturing approaches do) even the use phase is affected by the manufacturing approach selection. The present research provides a comprehensive environmental manufacturing approaches comparison for components made of aluminum alloys. Additive manufacturing (Selective Laser Sintering), machining, and forming processes are analyzed and compared by means of Life Cycle Assessment techniques. The effect of weight reduction enabled by additive approach is considered. The paper aims at highlighting the strong link between manufacturing approach selection and material use. In this respect, a thorough environmental analysis of the pre-manufacturing step is developed. Moreover, the influence of eco-attributes aluminium variability on the comparative analysis results is studied. The paper, therefore, contributes to the development of a methodology for manufacturing approaches comparison, providing guidelines for green manufacturing approach selection. Results reveal that, for the analyzed case studies, the Additive Manufacturing is a sustainable solution for aluminium components only under a specific scenario: high complexity shapes, significant weight reduction, and application in transportation systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:到目前为止,增材制造是金属基部件生产的可行替代方案。因此,设计人员通常在过程设计阶段必须选择三个选项:减法,节省质量和加法。给定过程的选择,除了会影响制造步骤的影响外,还会显着影响与材料生产步骤有关的影响。如果该工艺能够减轻零件重量(如增材制造方法一样),则使用阶段也会受到制造方法选择的影响。本研究为铝合金制成的部件提供了全面的环境制造方法比较。通过生命周期评估技术对增材制造(选择性激光烧结),机加工和成形工艺进行了分析和比较。考虑通过添加方法实现的减轻重量的效果。本文旨在强调制造方法选择与材料使用之间的紧密联系。在这方面,对预制造步骤进行了全面的环境分析。此外,研究了生态属性铝变异性对比较分析结果的影响。因此,本文有助于开发制造方法比较的方法,为绿色制造方法的选择提供指导。结果表明,对于所分析的案例研究而言,增材制造仅在以下特定情况下才是铝组件的可持续解决方案:高复杂度的形状,显着的重量减轻以及在运输系统中的应用。 (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Cleaner Production》 |2018年第1期|261-275|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Univ Palermo, Dept Ind & Digital Innovat DIID, Viale Sci, I-90128 Palermo, Italy;

    Politecn Torino, Dept Management & Prod Engn, Corso Duca Abruzzi 24, I-10129 Turin, Italy;

    Soochow Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Suzhou, Peoples R China;

    Katholieke Univ Leuven, Dept Mat Engn, Kasteelpk Arebberg 44, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号