...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Sustainability assessment of trenches including the new eco-trench: A multi-criteria decision-making tool
【24h】

Sustainability assessment of trenches including the new eco-trench: A multi-criteria decision-making tool

机译:包括新生态沟渠在内的沟渠可持续性评估:多标准决策工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Narrow trenches are a common technique for the installation of utility pipelines of small diameter. The excavated soil is not always appropriate as landfill and, in those cases, an appropriate soil from somewhere else (ex. a borrow pit or another construction site) should be used instead (classical solution, CS). Another common solution is to use a controlled low-strength (cementitious) material (CLSM) as backfill instead of compacted soil. However, both solutions lead to increased raw material consumption, waste generation, need for transportation, and CO2 emissions. In an attempt to address these issues, researchers developed an eco-trench (ECO) that reuses the excavated soil of narrow trenches to produce a controlled low-strength material to be used as landfill. Although technically viable, the sustainability of this solution versus the traditional solution has not been properly addressed. Hence, this paper aims to develop a method for the sustainability assessment of trenches. The Sustainability Index of Trenches (SIT), based on the MIVES decision-making method, enables the assessment and prioritisation of different types of trenches according to sustainability criteria. Criteria, indicators, weights and value functions were specifically defined based on seminars with experts in the field of utility services and construction. A case study was performed in which four types of trenches (CS, CS with recycling CS + R, CLSM and ECO) were assessed and prioritised according to SIT. ECO resulted in the most sustainable alternative with a SIT of 0.80 out of 1 followed by CS + R, CS and CLSM with SITs of 0.63, 0.40 and 0.38 respectively. The sensitivity analysis showed consistent results in different scenarios. These findings demonstrate the capability and reliability of SIT as a decision-making tool for the evaluation of the sustainability of different construction processes for trenches and the prioritisation of the most suitable solution for different situations. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:狭窄的沟槽是安装小直径公用管道的常用技术。挖出的土壤并不总是适合作为垃圾填埋场,在这种情况下,应使用其他地方(例如借坑或其他建筑工地)的合适土壤(经典解决方案,CS)。另一个常见的解决方案是使用受控的低强度(胶凝)材料(CLSM)作为回填土,而不是压实的土壤。但是,这两种解决方案都会导致原材料消耗,废物产生,运输需求和CO2排放量增加。为了解决这些问题,研究人员开发了一种生态沟渠(ECO),该生态沟渠可再利用狭窄沟渠的开挖土壤来生产受控的低强度材料,以用作垃圾填埋场。尽管从技术上讲可行,但是此解决方案相对于传统解决方案的可持续性尚未得到适当解决。因此,本文旨在开发一种沟槽可持续性评估的方法。基于MIVES决策方法的沟槽可持续发展指数(SIT),可以根据可持续性标准对不同类型的沟槽进行评估和优先级划分。标准,指标,权重和价值函数是在与公用事业服务和建筑领域的专家举行的研讨会的基础上特别定义的。进行了案例研究,其中根据SIT评估了四种类型的沟槽(CS,具有可回收CS + R的CS,CLSM和ECO)并确定了优先级。 ECO导致最可持续的替代方案,SIT为0.80(满分为1),其次是CS + R,CS和CLSM,SIT分别为0.63、0.40和0.38。敏感性分析显示了在不同情况下的一致结果。这些发现证明了SIT作为决策工具的能力和可靠性,该工具可用于评估沟渠不同施工工艺的可持续性,并为不同情况确定最合适的解决方案的优先级。 (C)2019 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号