...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Cleaner Production >Influence of end-of-life allocation, credits and other methodological issues in LCA of compounds: An in-company circular economy case study on packaging
【24h】

Influence of end-of-life allocation, credits and other methodological issues in LCA of compounds: An in-company circular economy case study on packaging

机译:寿命终止分配,信用和其他方法问题在化合物LCA中的影响:公司内部循环经济包装案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this article is to present a circular economy case study and investigate and discuss effects of end-of-life (EoL) allocation and crediting strategies on the results of this case study. In the case study, replacement of eucalyptus wood sheets, which are used to separate loaded pallets to prevent damaging each other during top storage in the company, by plastic compound alternatives composed of virgin PP, recycled PP and mineral fillers, is studied. When their life time is over, plastic compound sheets are sent to be recycled in the recycling facilities of the company. While performing this comparative LCA, a methodological discussion on how to credit the system in open-loop (OL) and close-loop (CL) recycling is performed. The use of Q factors (quality factors), instead of 1:1 substitution of virgin materials by recycled ones, is recommended and how to define these Q factors is discussed. The use of Q factors based on the mechanical properties of virgin and recycled materials, which is flexural modulus in this case, is recommended. Finally, a formula for the calculation of the Q factor of the compound material leaving the CL recycling after several recycling cycles, is proposed. Results show that, for this case study, plastic compound sheets are environmentally better alternative than eucalyptus wood sheets for most of the environmental impact categories evaluated due to the following reasons: higher number of uses, lower weight, use of recycled PP and mineral fillers, and longer lifetime. However, in two impact categories (resource depletion water and resource depletion mineral, fossils and renewables) eucalyptus wood sheets are found to have slightly better results. For the rest of the impact categories, the difference in the results are so high that different crediting methods do not affect the results in this case; however, they may in others. Among the scenarios evaluated OL recycling with market mix substitution is found to provide the highest impacts. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:本文的目的是提出一个循环经济案例研究,并研究和讨论寿命终止(EoL)分配和信用策略对本案例研究结果的影响。在案例研究中,研究了由纯聚丙烯,再生聚丙烯和矿物填料组成的塑料替代品替代用于分隔装载托盘以防止在公司顶部存储期间相互损坏的桉木板材。使用寿命结束后,塑料复合板将被送往公司的回收设施进行回收。在执行此比较性LCA时,进行了有关如何在开环(OL)和闭环(CL)循环中归功于系统的方法论性讨论。建议使用Q因子(质量因子),而不是用回收材料以1:1替代原始材料,并讨论如何定义这些Q因子。建议根据原始材料和再生材料的机械性能使用Q因子,在这种情况下,该因子即为弯曲模量。最后,提出了一个计算公式,该公式计算了在多次循环后离开CL循环的复合材料的Q因子。结果表明,对于此案例研究,在大多数环境影响类别中,塑料复合板在环境方面比桉木板更好,因为以下原因:使用次数更多,重量更轻,再生PP和矿物填料的使用,寿命更长。但是,在两种影响类别(资源枯竭水和资源枯竭矿物质,化石和可再生能源)中,桉木板材的效果略好。对于其余的影响类别,结果差异如此之大,以至于在这种情况下,不同的计入方法不会影响结果。但是,他们可能在其他人中。在经过评估的方案中,发现具有市场组合替代作用的OL回收产生的影响最大。 (C)2018 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号