...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Civil Society >Revalorizing the Political: Towards a New Intellectual Agenda for African Civil Society Discourse
【24h】

Revalorizing the Political: Towards a New Intellectual Agenda for African Civil Society Discourse

机译:重塑政治:建立非洲民间社会话语的新知识议程

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Who needs civil society? What is civil society useful for? While the foregoing and similar dilemmas dominated the early civil society literature on sub-Saharan Africa, this was soon followed by a steady shift to the analysis of non-governmental organizations. The shift foreshadowed the recent methodological approach to civil society research which emphasizes ‘measuring’ and ‘surveying’ civil society. In this essay, I contend that this approach, to the extent that it seems to totalize civil society as component voluntary associations that can be measured, deepens the crisis of understanding which it aspires to transcend. Yet, although I critique—and reject—this approach, I argue nonetheless that it ought to be seen as an opportunity to reinstate a more theoretically robust and politically driven imagination of civil society, one that problematizes, not just civil society organizations that are, ultimately, only an aspect of civil society, but the civil domain as a whole. While conceding that ‘measuring’ civil society has its own merits, I insist that it comes with a real danger of, first, reducing civil society to organizations, especially organizations that can be measured; and second, distracting students of African societies from the politicality that underpins much of the continent's socio-economic woes.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAfrica, civil society, measurement, voluntary associations, Alexis de Tocqueville, NGOsRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.626211
机译:谁需要民间社会?公民社会有什么用?尽管上述困境和类似困境在早期有关撒哈拉以南非洲的民间社会文献中占据了主导地位,但不久之后,人们便逐渐转向分析非政府组织。这一转变预示了最近的民间社会研究方法论方法,该方法强调了“测量”和“调查”民间社会。在本文中,我认为,这种方法在某种程度上似乎将民间社会作为可以衡量的组成部分的自愿协会进行了加深,加深了它渴望超越的理解危机。然而,尽管我批评“拒绝”这种方法,但我认为,应该将其视为一个机会,以恢复理论上更健全,更受政治驱动的公民社会的想象力,这不仅使存在问题的民间社会组织产生问题,最终仅是公民社会的一个方面,而是整个公民领域。我虽然承认“衡量”民间社会有其自身的优点,但我坚持认为它存在着一个真正的危险,首先是将民间社会减少为组织,尤其是可以衡量的组织;其次,分散非洲社会学生的注意力,而不是支撑非洲大陆大部分社会经济困境的政治性。弗朗西斯在线”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17448689.2011.626211

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号