首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >A Comment on Barnett and Block on Time Deposit and Bagus and How den on Loan Maturity Mismatching
【24h】

A Comment on Barnett and Block on Time Deposit and Bagus and How den on Loan Maturity Mismatching

机译:巴尼特与定期存款和巴格斯的阻滞以及贷款期限错配的原因

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In Time Deposits, Dimension, and Fraud (2009), William Barnett and Walter Block argue that by borrowing short and lending long there is an over issuance of property rights. Their article, however, does not fully extend the consequences of their contribution. Once this is done, it becomes clearer that their argument suits a great impediment to banking, becoming a possible reason to support rather than to oppose fractional reserve banking. Bagus and Howden (J Bus Ethics 90(3):399-406,2009) comment on Barnett and Block (J Bus Ethics 88(4):711-716,2009), the authors claim that while maintaining the illegitimacy of fractional reserve deposits, borrowing short and lending long it is actually not illegitimate. An extension on Bagus and Howden (2009) will show that their line of argumentation can be applied as a defense of fractional reserve banking as well.
机译:威廉·巴内特和沃尔特·布洛克在《定期存款,维度和欺诈》(2009)中指出,借入短期贷款和借出长期贷款会导致财产权的过度发行。但是,他们的文章并未完全扩展其贡献的后果。一旦做到这一点,就很清楚他们的论点非常适合银行业,成为支持而不是反对部分准备金的可能原因。 Bagus和Howden(J Bus Ethics 90(3):399-406,2009)对Barnett和Block(J Bus Ethics 88(4):711-716,2009)发表评论,作者声称在保持分数储备的合法性的同时存款,短期借贷和长期借贷实际上是不合法的。 Bagus和Howden(2009)的扩展将表明,他们的论点也可以用作部分准备金银行的辩护。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号