首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >The Ethical and Economic Case for Sweatshop Regulation
【24h】

The Ethical and Economic Case for Sweatshop Regulation

机译:血汗工厂监管的道德和经济案例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three types of objections have been raised against sweatshops. According to their critics, sweatshops are (1) exploitative, (2) coercive, and (3) harmful to workers. In "The Ethical and Economic Case Against Sweatshop Labor: A Critical Assessment," Powell and Zwolinski critique all three objections and thereby offer what is arguably the most powerful defense of sweatshops in the philosophical literature to date. This article demonstrates that, whether or not unregulated sweatshops are exploitative or coercive, they are, pace Powell and Zwolinski, harmful to workers.
机译:针对血汗工厂提出了三种反对意见。据他们的批评家说,血汗工厂是(1)剥削性的,(2)胁迫性的,(3)对工人有害的。鲍威尔和兹沃林斯基在“反对血汗工厂劳工的道德和经济案例:一项批判性评估”中对这三个反对意见进行了批评,从而提出了迄今为止在哲学文献中血汗工厂最有力的辩护。本文证明,不受监管的血汗工厂是否具有剥削性或强制性,对鲍威尔和兹沃林斯基来说都是有害的。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Business Ethics》 |2013年第3期|553-558|共6页
  • 作者

    Mathew Coakley; Michael Kates;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK;

    Program in Political Philosophy, Policy, and Law, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Sweatshops; Minimum wage; Labor law;

    机译:血汗工厂;最低工资;劳动法;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号