首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >Evidence on Whether Banks Consider Carbon Risk in Their Lending Decisions
【24h】

Evidence on Whether Banks Consider Carbon Risk in Their Lending Decisions

机译:关于银行是否考虑其贷款决策碳风险的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Banks face a dilemma in choosing between maximising profits and facilitating the sustainable use of resources within a carbon-constrained future. This study provides empirical evidence on this dilemma, investigating whether a bank loan announcement for a firm with high carbon risk conveys information to investors about the firm's carbon risk exposure collected through a bank's pre-loan screening and ongoing monitoring. We use a sample of 120 bank loan announcements for ASX-listed firms over the period 2009-2015. We measure high (low) carbon risk exposure based on whether firms meet (do not meet) the reporting threshold of the NGER scheme. We document positive and significant excess loan announcement returns for loan renewals for high carbon risk firms, but not for loan initiations. Further, we document a more significant loan announcement return for renewals with favourable term revisions. Finally, we find no evidence that the market differentiates between domestic and foreign lenders. Taken together, our results suggest that investors perceive that banks incorporate carbon risk considerations into their lending decisions. Our results highlight the value of banks as financial intermediaries given the information asymmetry surrounding firms' carbon risk exposure, and more generally the need to extend modern banking theory to consider issues such as the impact of banks' CSR reputation on lending decisions.
机译:银行在选择最大化利润和促进碳限制未来内的可持续利用之间的困境时面临困境。本研究为这种困境提供了实证证据,调查了一个高碳风险的公司的银行贷款公告是否将信息传达给投资者通过银行贷款筛查和正在进行的监测收集的公司碳风险暴露。在2009 - 2015年期间,我们将使用120家银行贷款公告的样本。基于公司是否会议(不符合)NGER计划的报告门槛,我们测量高(低)碳风险敞口。我们为高碳风险公司贷款续期贷款贷款公告回报,但不用于贷款延期。此外,我们记录了更加重要的贷款公告,以获得有利的重新修订。最后,我们没有发现市场区别于国内外贷方之间的证据。我们的结果表明,投资者认为银行将碳风险考虑纳入其贷款决策。我们的结果突出了银行作为金融中介的价值,鉴于围绕企业的碳风险曝光,更普遍需要扩展现代银行理论的必要性,以考虑银行企业社会责任声誉对贷款决策的影响等问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号