首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Business Ethics >The Evolution and Challenges of the Concept of Organizational Virtuousness in Positive Organizational Scholarship
【24h】

The Evolution and Challenges of the Concept of Organizational Virtuousness in Positive Organizational Scholarship

机译:积极组织奖学金中组织道德观的演变与挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper critically reviews and discusses the concept of organizational virtuousness as presented in positive organizational scholarship (POS). It identifies Kim S. Cameron, David S. Bright, and Arran Caza as the most influential researchers within this field and portrays commonalities, differences, and inconsistencies among the various notions of organizational virtuousness offered in positive organizational literature throughout the last 15years. While the commonalities refer to attributes, levels of analyses, outcomes, and methodology, the variances concern the locus of residence, the priority of outcomes, indicators, supporting features and the virtues included in positive organizational virtuousness. The analysis further discusses the strengths and weaknesses of these differences and stresses the challenges which the POS movement needs to face in order to clarify its definition of organizational virtuousness and, maybe, converge on one unified meaning. Finally, these challenges are summarized and linked to future research proposals which offer potential ideas on how to further develop the concept of positive organizational virtuousness.
机译:本文对积极组织奖学金(POS)中提出的组织道德概念进行了严格的审查和讨论。它确定了金·S·卡梅伦,大卫·S·布赖特和阿兰·卡扎为该领域最具影响力的研究人员,描绘了过去15年中积极组织文学中提出的各种组织道德观中的共性,差异和矛盾之处。虽然共通性是指属性,分析水平,结果和方法,但差异涉及居住地,结果的优先级,指标,支持特征以及积极的组织道德中包含的优点。分析进一步讨论了这些差异的优势和劣势,并强调了POS运动需要面对的挑战,以便阐明其组织道德的定义,并可能收敛于一个统一的含义。最后,总结了这些挑战并将其与未来的研究建议相联系,这些提议为如何进一步发展积极的组织道德观念提供了潜在的思路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号