...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Do industries matter in explaining stock returns and asset-pricing anomalies?
【24h】

Do industries matter in explaining stock returns and asset-pricing anomalies?

机译:行业在解释股票收益和资产定价异常方面是否重要?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Industry returns cannot be explained fully by well-known asset pricing models. This study reveals that common factors extracted from industry returns carry significant risk premiums that go beyond the explanatory power of size, book-to-market (BM) ratios, and momentum. In particular, this study shows that (1) the small-firm effect is significant only for firms whose market capitalization is below their industry average; (2) the BM effect is an intra-industry phenomenon; (3) a one-year momentum effect is significant only for firms whose BM ratio is smaller than the industry average and limited to non-January months; and (4) there is seasonality in all effects that cannot be explained by risk-based asset-pricing models. Neither rational nor behavioral theories alone can explain industry returns, and it is perhaps too hasty to attribute asset pricing anomalies to a single driving force.
机译:行业收益不能用众所周知的资产定价模型完全解释。这项研究表明,从行业回报中提取的共同因素带来的重大风险溢价超出了规模,账面市价比和动量的解释能力。特别是,这项研究表明:(1)小公司效应仅对市值低于其行业平均水平的公司有意义; (2)BM效应是行业内现象; (3)一年动量效应仅对BM比率小于行业平均值且限于非1月份的公司有意义; (4)所有影响都是季节性的,无法用基于风险的资产定价模型来解释。理性理论和行为理论都不能单独解释行业回报,将资产定价异常归因于单一驱动力也许太仓促。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号