首页> 外文期刊>Journal of banking & finance >Anticorruption regulation and firm value: Evidence from a shock of mandated resignation of directors in China
【24h】

Anticorruption regulation and firm value: Evidence from a shock of mandated resignation of directors in China

机译:反腐败法规和公司价值:来自中国董事被要求辞职的震惊的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China's broad anti-corruption campaign includes a regulation that requires bureaucrats to resign from director positions in listed companies. Using this particular event to test the effect of the anticorruption regulation, we find that this regulation costs firms with banned directors on average 4%. This cost cannot be explained by the typical cost of losing a director or by damage from a political vendetta conducted by the leadership. We further show that the anticorruption regulation impedes firm value not only through political connections but also through the anticorruption disincentive, the incentive to act passively for fear of being accused of corruption. Finally, affected firms reduce their investments, hire more employees and have poor performance afterwards. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:中国广泛的反腐败运动包括一项规定,要求官僚辞职在上市公司的董事职位。使用该特定事件来测试反腐败法规的效果,我们发现该法规使被禁董事的公司平均损失4%。无法用失去董事的典型成本或领导层进行的政治仇恨造成的损失来解释这一成本。我们进一步表明,反腐败法规不仅通过政治联系而且还通过反腐败抑制措施阻碍企业价值,反腐败抑制措施是出于害怕被指控腐败而采取被动行动的动机。最后,受影响的公司减少了投资,雇用了更多的员工,之后业绩不佳。 (C)2018 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号