...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Australian Studies >Australian journalists, travel writing and China: James Hingston, the 'Vagabond' and G. E. Morrison
【24h】

Australian journalists, travel writing and China: James Hingston, the 'Vagabond' and G. E. Morrison

机译:澳大利亚记者,旅行写作与中国:James Hingston,“流浪者”和G. E. Morrison

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

China looms large in the Australian imagination but, until recently, it has not been a significant travel destination. One result has been an imbalance between a superfluity of 'theoretical' knowledge and limited first-hand experience. This article investigates the relationship between the extensive popular 'knowledge' of China and the experience of actually being there in the travel writing of three influential nineteenth-century Australian journalists. Their accounts complicate any simple stereotype of Australians' attitudes towards China. As journalists, they sought to privilege the eyewitness. If their travels only confirmed what was already known, their 'on the spot' experience had no value. For the most part, they staged a narrative in which their discovery of the unexpected played a central role. This meant they had to construct a straw man of popular opinion, which they could then enthusiastically cut down on the basis of their superior first-hand knowledge.
机译:中国在澳大利亚的想像力中隐约可见,但是直到最近,它还不是一个重要的旅游目的地。一个结果就是过多的“理论”知识与有限的第一手经验之间的不平衡。本文研究了中国广泛流行的“知识”与在三位具有影响力的19世纪澳大利亚记者的旅行写作中实际存在的经验之间的关系。他们的叙述使澳大利亚人对中国态度的任何简单刻板印象变得复杂。作为记者,他们寻求使目击者享有特权。如果他们的旅行只证实了已知的信息,那么他们的“当场”经​​历就毫无价值。在大多数情况下,他们进行了叙事,他们对意外发现的发现发挥了核心作用。这意味着他们必须建立一个有民意的稻草人,然后他们可以基于他们精湛的第一手知识而热情地削减。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号