首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Asian earth sciences >Mineralogical and microfabric characteristics of magnetite in the Wuyang Precambrian BIFs, southern North China Craton: Implications for genesis and depositional processes of the associated BIFs
【24h】

Mineralogical and microfabric characteristics of magnetite in the Wuyang Precambrian BIFs, southern North China Craton: Implications for genesis and depositional processes of the associated BIFs

机译:华北克拉通南部舞阳前寒武纪BIF中磁铁矿的矿物学和微结构特征:对相关BIF的成因和沉积过程的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Precambrian Banded Iron Formations (BIFs) are widely distributed in the North China Craton (NCC). Among them, the Wuyang BIFs located in the southern margin of NCC occur in the Late Archaean Tieshan-miao Formation and can be subdivided in two different sub-types: (ⅰ) quartz-magnetite BIFs (QMB), consisting of magnetite, fine-microcrystalline quartz and minor calcite and (ⅱ) pyroxene-magnetite BIFs (PMB), composed of pyroxene, fine-microcrystalline quartz and subordinate feldspars. Both sub-types display apparent discrepancies in terms of petrography and mineral composition. As shown in Electron BackScattered Diffraction (EBSD) images and micrographs, magnetite grains from the QMB range in size from tens up to hundreds of μm, whereas magnetite crystals from the PMB can be up to a few tens of μm across. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) structural data indicate that magnetite from both BIF sub-types is equiaxed (cubic) and was generated by sedimentary metamorphic processes. The cell parameters of magnetite in the QMB are a = b=c = 8.396 A and Z = 8, which deviate slightly from these of magnetite in the PMB: a=b = c = 8.394 A and Z = 8. The analytical results of Raman spectroscopy analysis revealed micro-structural signatures of both magnetite (Raman shifts near 552 cm~(-1) and 673 cm~(-1)) and hematite (Raman shifts near 227 cm~(-1), 295 cm~(-1) and 413 cm~(-1)). In magnetite from both QMB and PMB, the crystallinity degree is similar for magnetite micro-structures but varies significantly for hematite micro-structures. Oxygen fugacity (fO_2) conditions fluctuated during the recrystallization of magnetite in the QMB, whereas no evident variation of fO_2 occurred during the formation of magnetite in the PMB. Analytical results of laser ablation inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) show that the Si, Al and Mg abundances are higher in magnetite from the QMB, whereas the Ti and Mn contents are more elevated in magnetite from the PMB. Magnetite composition also denotes that both BIF sub-types are sed-imentary-metamorphic origin, whereas the deposition of PMB was also affected by volcanic activities. Overall data indicate that the differences in the depositional environment of each BIF sub-type are due to the involvement of volcanic eruption processes in the genesis of the PMB. Thus, this paper indicated that the QMB was deposited by chemical deposition at the long-term interval of volcanic eruptions, and the PMB were the product of chemical deposition affected by the volcanic eruption.
机译:前寒武纪带状铁层(BIF)在华北克拉通(NCC)中广泛分布。其中,位于NCC南部边缘的五羊BIF发生在太古宙铁山庙组晚期,可细分为两种不同的亚型:(ⅰ)石英磁铁矿BIF(QMB),由磁铁矿,细铁矿组成。微晶石英,次方解石和(ⅱ)辉石-磁铁矿BIF(PMB),由辉石,精细微晶石英和从属长石组成。两种亚型在岩石学和矿物组成方面均表现出明显的差异。如电子背散射衍射(EBSD)图像和显微照片所示,来自QMB的磁铁矿晶粒的尺寸范围从几十微米到数百微米,而来自PMB的磁铁矿晶体的宽度可达几十微米。 X射线衍射(XRD)结构数据表明,两种BIF亚型的磁铁矿都是等轴的(立方的),是通过沉积变质作用产生的。 QMB中磁铁矿的晶胞参数为a = b = c = 8.396 A和Z = 8,与PMB中磁铁矿的晶胞参数略有不同:a = b = c = 8.394 A和Z = 8。拉曼光谱分析揭示了磁铁矿(拉曼位移接近552 cm〜(-1)和673 cm〜(-1))和赤铁矿(拉曼位移接近227 cm〜(-1),295 cm〜(-)的微观结构特征。 1)和413 cm〜(-1))。在QMB和PMB的磁铁矿中,磁铁矿微结构的结晶度相似,但赤铁矿微结构的结晶度却有很大差异。 QMB中磁铁矿重结晶过程中的氧逸度(fO_2)条件波动,而PMB中磁铁矿形成过程中fO_2没有明显变化。激光烧蚀电感耦合等离子体质谱(LA-ICP-MS)的分析结果表明,QMB磁铁矿中的Si,Al和Mg丰度更高,而PMB磁铁矿中的Ti和Mn含量更高。磁铁矿成分还表明,这两种BIF亚型都是沉积-早变质成因的,而PMB的沉积也受到火山活动的影响。总体数据表明,每种BIF亚型在沉积环境方面的差异是由于PMB起源中涉及火山喷发过程。因此,本文表明QMB是在火山喷发的长期间隔内通过化学沉积而沉积的,而PMB是受火山喷发影响的化学沉积的产物。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of Asian earth sciences》 |2014年第11期|267-281|共15页
  • 作者单位

    Key Laboratory of Mineral Resource, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China,Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resource Survey, Guangzhou 510275, China;

    Key Laboratory of Mineral Resource, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;

    Key Laboratory of Mineral Resource, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;

    Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resource Survey, Guangzhou 510275, China,Department of the Earth Science of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;

    Department of the Earth Science of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;

    Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resource Survey, Guangzhou 510275, China,Department of the Earth Science of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;

    Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resource Survey, Guangzhou 510275, China,Department of the Earth Science of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;

    Key Laboratory of Mineral Resource, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China;

    Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Geological Processes and Mineral Resource Survey, Guangzhou 510275, China,Department of the Earth Science of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    North China Craton; BIF; Magnetite; Diagenetic metamorphism; Chemical deposition;

    机译:华北克拉通;BIF;磁铁矿;成岩变质;化学沉积;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号