【24h】

Overlooking the visual

机译:俯瞰视觉

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is widely acknowledged in literature on design theory and confirmed as part of the research project 'Cognitive abilities and the art of design' that in order to design, not only is it necessary to be visually aware, but also that visual thinking is an important part of the design process. But do we know why? One of the findings of the research project is that what visual awareness or visual thinking entails is far from clear. How these concepts relate to each other and to similar notions such as visual literacy, the visual language or visual skill, visualisation or imaging remains ambiguous. What is clear is that whenever 'the visual' is referred to in design theory, what is being invoked in one way or another is a mode of thinking closely associated with creativity, subjectivity and intuition. A metaphysical concept, this is deeply problematic educationally. How students might be taught any skills associated with the visual, or indeed, whether or not it is possible to teach anything visual is debatable. The thesis of this paper is that difficulties surrounding the concept are philosophical, rather than psychological or cognitive. After introducing the main concerns of pragmatism, the paper considers various interconnected and related interpretations of the visual. It outlines problems these interpretations cause in the design studio and explores the philosophical foundations of the concept. To clarify its role in design, the paper offers an alternative analysis of the visual from a pragmatic perspective. Shifting paradigms to dispense with the need to rely on the notion of different modes of thinking, provides a basis not only to give a definition of visual skill which has a clear educational rationale, but also to make explicit the role of visual skill in the design process and to throw light on the apparently elusive connection between design theory and practice. The overall ambition of this research is to make it easier to teach and develop artistic sensibility in design. This paper is based on a conference paper presented at the ECLAS (European Conference of Landscape Architecture Schools) conference in Berlin in September 1999. It emerges from the research project 'Cognitive abilities and the art of design' funded by the Leverhulme Trust, an investigation of the philosophy and practice of design education within landscape architecture. This involved interviewing eminent practitioners and educators in landscape architecture, both in the United States and Europe, analysis of questionnaires undertaken by students of landscape architecture and drawings undertaken by children and students from a range of disciplines. It draws on several years' experience teaching landscape design studios at undergraduate and postgraduate level. (A book developing this research is to be published shortly by Routledge.)
机译:在设计理论文献中得到了广泛认可,并作为“认知能力和设计艺术”研究项目的一部分得到确认,为了进行设计,不仅需要视觉感知,而且视觉思维也很重要。设计过程的一部分。但是我们知道为什么吗?该研究项目的发现之一是视觉意识或视觉思维所需要的东西还很不清楚。这些概念如何相互关联以及如何与类似的概念(例如视觉素养,视觉语言或视觉技能,可视化或成像)相关联,仍然模棱两可。显而易见的是,每当在设计理论中提到“视觉”时,以一种或另一种方式调用的是一种与创造力,主观性和直觉紧密相关的思维方式。一个形而上学的概念,这在教育上是一个严重的问题。如何教给学生任何与视觉有关的技能,或者实际上,是否有可能教任何视觉的东西值得商bat。本文的论点是,围绕该概念的困难是哲学上的,而不是心理上的或认知上的。在介绍了实用主义的主要关注点之后,本文考虑了视觉的各种相互关联和相关的解释。它概述了这些解释在设计工作室中引起的问题,并探讨了该概念的哲学基础。为了阐明其在设计中的作用,本文从务实的角度对视觉进行了另一种分析。转变范式以免去依赖于不同思维方式的观念,不仅为给出具有清晰教育原理的视觉技能定义奠定了基础,而且还明确了视觉技能在设计中的作用过程,阐明设计理论与实践之间似乎难以捉摸的联系。这项研究的总体目标是使设计方面的教学和艺术敏感性变得更容易。本文基于1999年9月在柏林举行的ECLAS(欧洲景观建筑学校会议)会议上提交的会议论文。该论文来自Leverhulme Trust资助的研究项目“认知能力和设计艺术”,该研究景观设计中的设计教育的哲学和实践。这涉及采访美国和欧洲的著名景观设计从业者和教育家,分析景观设计专业学生的问卷,以及儿童和各学科学生绘制的图画。它借鉴了多年在本科和研究生级别上教学景观设计工作室的经验。 (有关这项研究的书籍即将由Routledge出版。)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号