首页> 外文期刊>Journal of architectural and planning research >MODERNITY VS. POSTMODERNITY IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION
【24h】

MODERNITY VS. POSTMODERNITY IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION

机译:现代性与建筑教育中的后现代

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Postmodern thought had a dissolving and decomposing effect on the foundationalist theories of architecture and set practice free in the choice of function-form, form-meaning relations. During the last four decades some dissident narratives have enthralled many supporters. Contingent with these major transformations in architectural philosophy and practice, architectural education in general and design studios in particular have been affected. Some believe that in the face of such indeterminacy, non-predictability, and tolerated individualism, studio masters have lost their credibility and studio criticism has turned into a debate between the student and the master. It is quite clear that the nature of the critique has changed to a certain extent, but this drastic transforming and transferring of ideas and values has no impact on the content of architectural critique.
机译:后现代思想对建筑学的基础理论产生了分解和分解的作用,并在功能形式,形式意义关系的选择上放开了实践。在过去的四十年中,一些持不同政见的言论吸引了许多支持者。伴随着建筑哲学和实践的这些重大转变,一般的建筑教育尤其是设计工作室受到了影响。有人认为,面对这种不确定性,不可预测性和容忍的个人主义,工作室主管失去了公信力,工作室批评已成为学生和主人之间的辩论。很明显,批评的性质已经在一定程度上发生了变化,但是这种思想和价值的急剧转变和转移对建筑批评的内容没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号