...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of applied statistics >Patterns of earnings differentials across three conservative European welfare regimes with alternative education systems
【24h】

Patterns of earnings differentials across three conservative European welfare regimes with alternative education systems

机译:带有替代教育系统的三个欧洲保守福利制度的收入差异模式

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The aim of this paper is to investigate, from a generational perspective, the effect of human capital on individual earnings and earnings differences in Germany, France and Italy, three developed countries in Western Europe with similar conservative welfare regimes but with important differences in their education systems. Income inequalities between and within education levels are explored using a two-stage probit model with quantile regressions in the second stage. More precisely, drawing upon 2005 EU-SILC data, returns on schooling and experience are estimated separately for employees and self-employed full-time workers by means of Mincerian earnings equations with sample selection; the sample selection correction accounts for the potential individual self-selection into the two labour force types. Although some determinants appear to be relatively similar across countries, state-specific differentials are drawn in light of the institutional features of each national context. The study reveals how each dimension of human capital differently affects individuals' earnings and earnings inequality and, most of all, how their impacts differ along the conditional earnings distribution and across countries. In the comparative perspective, the country's leading position in terms of the highest rewards on education also depends on which earnings distribution (employee vs. self-employed) is analysed.
机译:本文的目的是从后代的角度研究人力资本对德国,法国和意大利,西欧三个发达国家,具有类似保守福利制度但教育水平存在重大差异的个人收入和收入差异的影响系统。使用两阶段概率模型在第二阶段进行分位数回归,探索教育水平之间和教育水平之内的收入不平等。更准确地说,利用Mincerian收入方程和样本选择,分别利用2005年EU-SILC数据,分别估算员工和自雇全职员工的学业回报和经验。样本选择修正将潜在的个人自我选择解释为两种劳动力类型。尽管某些决定因素在各个国家似乎相对相似,但是根据每个国家背景的制度特征得出了各州之间的差异。这项研究揭示了人力资本的各个方面如何不同地影响个人的收入和收入不平等,最重要的是,他们的影响在有条件的收入分配和整个国家之间如何不同。从比较的角度来看,该国在获得最高教育奖励方面的领先地位还取决于分析哪种收入分配(员工与自雇)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号