首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Applied Accounting Research >Implications of regulatory prescriptions and audit standards on the evolution of forensic accounting in the audit process
【24h】

Implications of regulatory prescriptions and audit standards on the evolution of forensic accounting in the audit process

机译:监管规定和审计标准对审计过程中法务会计发展的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to determine if there is a level of agreement among accounting academics, auditors, and forensic accountants that the current environmental framework created by regulatory and standard setting bodies appears to require a merger of common ground between forensic accounting and auditing. Design/methodology/approach – A survey in the USA is conducted for a random sample of accounting academics, forensic accounting practitioners, and auditors questioning if the addition of forensic accounting proficiency should be part of an auditor's skill set to increase the probability of detecting fraud. Findings – The results indicate that forensic accounting has a place in the audit process and that auditors may need to add some of these skills as the market for audits have changed. Research limitations/implications – The limitation of the current paper which is inherent to survey research is non-response bias. The only way to evaluate this is to test late responses and compare them to earlier results. There are no significant differences. Future research in this area should progress to experimental designs using foundational forensic procedures in a simulated audit setting to ascertain the success and the proper implementation of these skills in finding financial statement fraud. Practical implications – This paper will increase auditor awareness of the importance of the acquisition of foundational forensic accounting skills that will enhance the likelihood of fraud detection. Originality/value – Professions evolve by way of regulatory, political, and social responses. Although there are some distinct differences between forensic accountants and auditors in the USA, there is enough common ground to answer the call for auditors to be more mindful of finding fraud. This paper intends to draw attention to the fact that foundational forensic accounting skills may represent a paradigm shift for professional skills in the accounting markets.
机译:目的–本文的目的是确定会计学者,审计师和法务会计师之间是否达成某种程度的协议,即监管机构和标准制定机构创建的当前环境框架似乎需要法医会计和法务会计之间的共同点合并。审核。设计/方法/方法–在美国进行的一项调查是对会计学者,法务会计从业人员和审计师进行的随机抽样调查,询问是否增加法务会计能力应作为审计师技能的一部分,以增加发现欺诈的可能性。调查结果–结果表明,法务会计在审计过程中占有一席之地,随着审计市场的变化,审计师可能需要增加其中一些技能。研究的局限性/含义-调查研究固有的本文局限性是无回应偏差。评估此问题的唯一方法是测试较晚的响应并将其与较早的结果进行比较。没有显着差异。在该领域的未来研究应在模拟审计环境中使用基本的法证程序进行实验设计,以确定在发现财务报表欺诈中这些技能的成功实施和正确实施。实际意义–本文将提高审计师对获取基本法务会计技能的重要性的认识,这将提高欺诈检测的可能性。原创性/价值–专业通过监管,政治和社会回应而发展。尽管在美国,法务会计师和审计师之间存在一些明显的差异,但有足够的共同点来回答要求审计师更注意发现欺诈的呼吁。本文旨在提请注意以下事实:基本的法务会计技能可能代表了会计市场中专业技能的范式转变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号