首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >AVIATION LAW — 'INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTA- TION' UNDER THE WARSAW CONVENTION — NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT A TRAVELER'S INDEPENDENTLY PURCHASED DOMESTIC FLIGHT IN A FOREIGN NATION WAS NOT A 'SINGLE OPERATION' OF INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL UNDER THE WARSAW
【24h】

AVIATION LAW — 'INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORTA- TION' UNDER THE WARSAW CONVENTION — NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT A TRAVELER'S INDEPENDENTLY PURCHASED DOMESTIC FLIGHT IN A FOREIGN NATION WAS NOT A 'SINGLE OPERATION' OF INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL UNDER THE WARSAW

机译:航空法-根据《华沙公约》进行的“国际运输”-间接证据表明,旅客在外国独立购买国内航班并不是在华沙公约下对国际旅行的“单一操作”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The Warsaw Convention ("Convention") governs "all international transportation of persons." Transportation is international when a passenger travels between two nations that are High Contracting Parties to the Convention. Multiple stops on multiple carriers constitute international travel if the segments are regarded by the contracting parties as a "single operation" of "undivided transportation." In Coyle v. P.T. Garuda Indonesia, the Ninth Circuit narrowly applied the definition of "international transportation," holding that two sets of tickets on the same airline, one set international and the other set domestic, purchased at different times and places, do not constitute a "single operation." The narrow holding in Coyle disregards the explicit text of the Convention and ignores the objective evidence presented by the tickets. Moreover, the holding ignores modern trends in travel planning, creating a loophole for airlines to selectively apply the Convention for separately purchased tickets that would otherwise be considered a "single operation," while undermining the primary goal of the Convention—to harmonize and unify international aviation law.
机译:《华沙公约》(“公约”)管辖“所有人员的国际运输”。当旅客在作为公约缔约国的两个国家之间旅行时,运输是国际性的。如果各缔约方将航段视为“统一运输”的“单一业务”,则在多个承运人上多次停靠即构成国际旅行。在Coyle诉P.T.印尼鹰航(Garuda Indonesia),第九巡回赛狭义地使用了“国际运输”的定义,认为在同一家航空公司在不同时间和地点购买的两套票,一套国际票和另一套国内票,并不构成“单一操作” 。” Coyle的狭义地位无视《公约》的明确文本,而忽略了票证所提供的客观证据。此外,控股公司无视旅行计划的现代趋势,给航空公司造成了漏洞,使航空公司有选择地将《公约》适用于单独购买的机票,否则将被视为“单一业务”,同时破坏了《公约》的主要目标,即协调和统一国际航班。航空法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号