...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Air Law and Commerce >THERE IS NO COMPLETE, IMPLIED, OR FIELD FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW PERSONAL INJURY/ WRONGFUL DEATH NEGLIGENCE or PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS IN GENERAL AVIATION CASES
【24h】

THERE IS NO COMPLETE, IMPLIED, OR FIELD FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW PERSONAL INJURY/ WRONGFUL DEATH NEGLIGENCE or PRODUCT LIABILITY CLAIMS IN GENERAL AVIATION CASES

机译:在一般航空案件中,没有完全,隐含或现场联邦对州法律的人身伤害/严重死亡过失或产品责任索赔进行赔偿

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In recent litigation against general aviation aircraft and component manufacturers, arguments have been made that there is complete, implied, or field federal preemption of a plaintiff's state law personal injury and wrongful death claims involving a general aviation aircraft. Abdullah v. American Airlines, Inc., an anomaly commercial airline case discussing operational services, is being used as a basis for this preemption argument.
机译:在最近针对通用航空飞机及其部件制造商的诉讼中,有人提出,原告的州法律对通用航空飞机的人身伤害和不当死亡索赔具有完全,隐含或现场的联邦优先权。 Abdullah诉American Airlines,Inc.这是一个讨论运营服务的反常商业航空公司案,正在被用作这种先发制人的依据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号