首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Advanced Transportation >The Surrogate Safety Appraisal of the Unconventional Elliptical and Turbo Roundabouts
【24h】

The Surrogate Safety Appraisal of the Unconventional Elliptical and Turbo Roundabouts

机译:非常规椭圆和Turbo回旋处的替代安全性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Double-lane roundabouts have been created in many European countries over the past few centuries and are now characterized by an unsafe geometric development and by a low sustainability capacity or level. In this regard, new double-lane geometries have been implemented to overcome to these critical points. This article shows a comparison of two nonconventional double-lane roundabout schemes defined as elliptical and turbo. Considering this research on the unsafe and congested conditions for each road schemes at grade, the microsimulation approach allows comparing schemes of intersections not yet realized in order to be able to evaluate the critical issues. A symmetric traffic distribution and an identical vehicle mix for both design solutions are considered. The research was conducted considering two different double-lane roundabout-turbo roundabout and the elliptical roundabout. By comparing their geometry and technical elements, this article assumes that turbo roundabout due to its physical separating traffic lanes in the central circulatory carriageway will enable potentially better traffic safety conditions. This article has the following main goal: a comparison of traffic safety using VISSIM microsimulator and SSAM tools. The results can provide to show safety level on investigated scenario considering level of service (LOS) and also the possibility of obtaining time to collision (TTC) and postencroachment time (PET) through the use of surrogate parameters obtained by SSAM tool. In fact, the surrogate safety parameters allows evaluating the possible collision scenarios between them, according to the trajectories of the single vehicles. This assessment is useful in order to be able to evaluate by the local authorities which of the examined schemes can provide greater negativity in the construction and operation phase. Therefore this comparative analysis allows reducing, in the preliminary phase, possible security impacts and also economic ones for the community.
机译:在过去的几个世纪中,许多欧洲国家都建立了双车道环形交叉路口,其特点是几何形状发展不安全,可持续能力或水平较低。在这方面,已经实现了新的双车道几何形状以克服这些关键点。本文显示了两种定义为椭圆形和涡轮形的非常规双车道环行方案的比较。考虑到对每种道路方案在坡度上的不安全和拥挤状况的研究,微观模拟方法允许比较尚未实现的交叉口方案,以便能够评估关键问题。两种设计方案均考虑了对称的交通分配和相同的车辆组合。该研究是在考虑两个不同的双车道回旋处,涡轮回旋处和椭圆回旋处的情况下进行的。通过比较它们的几何形状和技术要素,本文假设涡轮回旋处由于其在中央循环行车道中的物理分隔行车线而将使潜在的更好的交通安全状况成为可能。本文的主要目标如下:使用VISSIM微型模拟器和SSAM工具比较交通安全。结果可以显示考虑服务水平(LOS)的调查场景的安全级别,以及通过使用SSAM工具获得的替代参数获得碰撞时间(TTC)和侵占后时间(PET)的可能性。实际上,替代安全参数允许根据单个车辆的轨迹评估它们之间可能发生的碰撞情况。此评估很有用,以便能够由地方当局评估哪些已检查的方案可以在施工和运营阶段提供更大的负面效果。因此,这种比较分析可以在初期减少对社区的可能的安全影响以及经济影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号