...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >Silence is golden? Evidence from disclosing related-party transactions in China
【24h】

Silence is golden? Evidence from disclosing related-party transactions in China

机译:沉默是金?在中国披露关联交易的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The significance and the manipulative nature of related-party transactions (RPTs) render transparent disclosure necessary and relevant for investors who infer firm value from accounting disclosures. However, the full disclosure of RPTs may not be cost effective because not all of the information that firms possess is value relevant to financial statement users. This study provides new evidence on the value relevance of additional disclosure on RPTs by using a unique, mandatory disclosure requirement of transfer pricing policies in China. We hypothesize and find that, compared to the mere disclosure of amounts for related-party sales, the disclosure of transfer pricing methods provides incremental value relevant information beyond total sales. We also show that the disclosure of transfer pricing details complements weak corporate governance mechanisms and improves the prediction of abnormal returns. Our findings are robust to various model specifications, and demonstrate the significance of transparent and relevant RPT disclosure in inferring firm value. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:关联交易(RPT)的重要性和操纵性使得透明披露对于从会计披露中推断出公司价值的投资者而言是必要且相关的。但是,完全披露RPT可能并不具有成本效益,因为并非企业拥有的所有信息都与财务报表使用者相关。这项研究通过使用中国转让定价政策独特的,强制性的披露要求,为RPT附加披露的价值相关性提供了新的证据。我们假设并发现,与仅披露关联方销售金额相比,转让定价方法的披露提供了除总销售额以外的与增值相关的信息。我们还表明,转让定价细节的披露可以补充薄弱的公司治理机制,并改善对异常收益的预测。我们的发现对各种模型规范都具有鲁棒性,并证明了透明且相关的RPT披露在推断公司价值中的重要性。 (C)2016 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号