...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of accounting and public policy >Borrowing capacity and earnings management: An analysis of private loans in private firms
【24h】

Borrowing capacity and earnings management: An analysis of private loans in private firms

机译:借贷能力和盈余管理:对私营公司私人贷款的分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This empirical study investigates whether borrowers manage earnings to ameliorate their accounting portrait and to achieve a better borrowing capacity in the private loan market. We analyse the impact of borrowers' earnings management activity on the amount and costs of their private loans both at the time of lending (ex post earnings management) and before a lending agreement is made (ex ante earnings management). We test our hypothesis on a panel sample of 465 small and medium-sized private corporations from the debt-dependent southern EU economies of Italy, Portugal and Spain over the 2002-2012 period. Using a generalized method of moments (GMM) model to control for endogeneity, we find that the discretionary earnings management activity of borrowers favours larger loan amounts, both ex post and ex ante. By contrast, we find no impact of borrowers' earnings management activity on the costs of loans. Interestingly, we find that the relationship between earnings management and firms' borrowing capacity is not significant before the enactment of the Basel II regulation; however, in the period following its enactment, we find a positive and systematic impact of earnings management (both ex post and ex ante) on the amount of bank loans, as well as some positive impact on the costs of bank loans. Our results indicate that borrowers manage earnings to signal better quality to lenders and to ameliorate their borrowing capacities, regardless of the excessive costs of doing so. In addition, we find that the introduction of the Basel II rules likely strengthened this tendency. The findings of this research should alert bank regulators to the feasibility of an unintended economic consequence of rigid discipline with respect to bank risk taking namely, reducing borrowers' transparency may lead to less prudent assessments of borrowers' creditworthiness. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
机译:这项实证研究调查了借款人是否通过管理收益来改善其会计状况并在私人贷款市场中实现更好的借贷能力。我们分析借款人在借贷时(事后盈余管理)和签订贷款协议之前(事前盈余管理)的收入管理活动对其私人贷款的数量和成本的影响。我们在2002-2012年期间,对来自依赖债务的南部欧盟经济体意大利,葡萄牙和西班牙的465家中小型私营公司进行了小组抽样检验,检验了我们的假设。使用广义矩方法(GMM)模型来控制内生性,我们发现借款人的任意收益管理活动倾向于事后和事后获得更大的贷款额。相比之下,我们发现借款人的盈余管理活动对贷款成本没有影响。有趣的是,我们发现在实施《巴塞尔协议II》之前,盈余管理与企业借贷能力之间的关系并不重要。但是,在颁布后的一段时间内,我们发现盈余管理(事后和事后)对银行贷款的数量产生了积极而系统的影响,并对银行贷款的成本也产生了积极的影响。我们的结果表明,借款人管理收入的目的是向贷方发出更好的信号,并改善其借贷能力,而不管这样做的成本如何。此外,我们发现引入《巴塞尔协议II》规则可能会加强这种趋势。这项研究的结果应使银行监管者警惕在银行风险承担方面采取严格纪律的意料之外的经济后果的可行性,即降低借款人的透明度可能导致对借款人信用度的审慎评估减少。 (C)2017 Elsevier Inc.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号