首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems >Comparison of two intelligent transportation systems Wrong-Way driving countermeasures currently deployed on Florida toll roads
【24h】

Comparison of two intelligent transportation systems Wrong-Way driving countermeasures currently deployed on Florida toll roads

机译:两种智能交通系统的比较,错误的驾驶对策目前部署在佛罗里达省收费道路上

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Wrong way driving (WWD) crashes on high-speed limited access facilities often cause severe injuries and deaths. Conventional "Wrong Way" signs can reduce WWD events but can be insufficient in some cases. Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) WWD countermeasures can more effectively notify wrong-way drivers of their mistake. This paper compares the safety performance of two types of ITS WWD countermeasures implemented in Florida: Light-Emitting Diode (LED) signs in South Florida (which include one set of signs and one camera) and Rectangular Flashing Beacon (RFB) signs in Central Florida (which include two sets of signs and three cameras). The reduction in WWD events (911 calls and citations) and the percentage of wrong-way drivers who self-corrected their WWD behavior were used as surrogate safety performance measures instead of crashes, since WWD crashes are rare. Chi-squared tests revealed a significant reduction in WWD events at the LED and RFB treated sites compared to control sites without these countermeasures. Comparison group analyses indicated that the LED and RFB countermeasures reduced WWD events by 48.1% and 69.4%, respectively. Additionally, photographs taken by cameras on the countermeasures and/or closed-circuit television cameras monitored by the traffic management centers showed that over 16% of the 72 detected wrong-way vehicles self-corrected at the LED sites and 81% of the 353 detected wrong-way vehicles self-corrected at the RFB sites. The methods and results in this paper can help transportation agencies throughout the United States identify the most suitable WWD countermeasures and evaluate their performance.
机译:驾驶(WWD)在高速限制接入设施上崩溃的错误方式经常导致严重的伤害和死亡。传统的“错误方式”标志可以减少WWD事件,但在某些情况下可能不足。智能交通系统(其)WWD对策可以更有效地通知错误的司机错误。本文比较了佛罗里达州实施的两种类型的WWD对策的安全性能:南佛罗里达州南佛罗里达州的发光二极管(LED)迹象,包括佛罗里达州中部的一组迹象和一套相机)和矩形闪烁标牌(RFB)标志(包括两组标志和三个摄像机)。自行改性事件(911个呼叫和引用)的减少和自我纠正其WWD行为的错误方式驾驶员被用作代理安全性能措施而不是崩溃,因为WWD崩溃很少。奇方检验显示LED和RFB处理位点的WWD事件显着减少,而无需这些对策。比较组分析表明,LED和RFB对策分别将WWD事件减少48.1%和69.4%。此外,摄像机上采集的照片和交通管理中心监控的对策和/或闭路电视摄像机的照片显示,72的16%以上检测到在LED部位自我校正的错误方式和353的81%在RFB网站上自我纠正的错误车辆。本文的方法和结果可以帮助整个美国的运输机构确定最合适的WWD对策并评估其表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号