...
首页> 外文期刊>ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing >Conventional and fuzzy comparisons of large scale land cover products: Application to CORINE, GLC2000, MODIS and GlobCover in Europe
【24h】

Conventional and fuzzy comparisons of large scale land cover products: Application to CORINE, GLC2000, MODIS and GlobCover in Europe

机译:大型土地覆盖产品的常规和模糊比较:在欧洲的CORINE,GLC2000,MODIS和GlobCover中的应用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

One of the major drawbacks of land cover products is the lack of interoperability among them. Since their development was driven by different national or international initiatives, they were developed for different purposes and hold diverse technical characteristics. Thus, comparison among products and quality monitoring is necessary in assessing their usefulness. This paper provides a methodology to compare global land cover maps that allows for differences in legend definitions among products. Two different approaches were considered for map comparison, a Boolean approach and a new methodology based on fuzzy set theory in which the Land Cover Classification System (LCCS) acted as a general bridging system. The fuzzy approach let us reconcile legends in terms of a set of nine selected attributes. The methodology is illustrated over Europe using four different land cover products: CORINE, GLC2000, MODIS land cover (MODISLC) and GlobCover. Overall accuracies between datasets based on a generalized nomenclature ranged from 35% (GlobCov-er-MODISLC) to 57% (CORINE-GLC2000). A further assessment based on a flexible Boolean comparison allowed us to minimize part of the uncertainty introduced by ambiguity of legends, resulting in an overall increase of agreement of around 10% in absolute terms. Reduction of positional errors produced an agreement increase of around 5%. The fuzzy approach allowed us to examine certain criteria used in classification systems to better understand the causes of discrepancies among datasets and express them in terms of relevant land attributes, irrespective of class names. This method served to highlight the consistency of the land cover maps under consideration, especially for datasets that showed higher divergences. In particular, it allows the identification of areas that are very close in land attributes, even when a Boolean comparison shows them as different.
机译:土地覆被产品的主要缺点之一是它们之间缺乏互操作性。由于它们的发展是由不同的国家或国际倡议驱动的,因此它们是为不同的目的而开发的,并且具有多种技术特征。因此,在评估产品的有用性时,必须进行产品之间的比较和质量监控。本文提供了一种比较全球土地覆盖图的方法,该方法可以使产品之间的图例定义有所不同。考虑了两种不同的地图比较方法,一种是布尔方法,另一种是基于模糊集理论的新方法,其中土地覆被分类系统(LCCS)作为一般的桥梁系统。模糊方法使我们可以根据一组九个选定的属性来调和图例。该方法在欧洲使用四种不同的土地覆盖产品进行了说明:CORINE,GLC2000,MODIS土地覆盖(MODISLC)和GlobCover。基于广义命名法的数据集之间的总体准确性范围从35%(GlobCov-er-MODISLC)到57%(CORINE-GLC2000)。基于灵活的布尔比较的进一步评估使我们能够最大程度地减少由图例的歧义引入的部分不确定性,从而使协议的整体绝对价值增加约10%。减少位置误差可以使协议增加约5%。模糊方法使我们能够检查分类系统中使用的某些标准,以更好地理解数据集之间差异的原因,并根据相关土地属性来表达它们,而与类别名称无关。这种方法有助于突出显示所考虑的土地覆盖图的一致性,尤其是对于那些表现出较大差异的数据集而言。尤其是,即使布尔比较显示区域属性不同,它也可以识别出土地属性非常接近的区域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号