...
首页> 外文期刊>ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing >Estimation of vertical plant area density profiles in a rice canopy at different growth stages by high-resolution portable scanning lidar with a lightweight mirror
【24h】

Estimation of vertical plant area density profiles in a rice canopy at different growth stages by high-resolution portable scanning lidar with a lightweight mirror

机译:通过带轻量镜的高分辨率便携式扫描激光雷达估算不同生长阶段水稻冠层的垂直植物面积密度分布

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We used a high-resolution portable scanning lidar together with a lightweight mirror and a voxel-based canopy profiling method to estimate the vertical plant area density (PAD) profile of a rice (Oryza sativa L cv. Koshihikari) canopy at different growth stages. To improve the laser's penetration of the dense canopy, we used a mirror to change the direction of the laser beam from horizontal to vertical (0°) and off-vertical (30°). The estimates of PAD and plant area index (PAI) were more accurate at 30° than at 0°. The root-mean-square errors of PAD at each growth stage ranged from 1.04 to 3.33 m~2 m~(-3) at 0° and from 0.42 to 2.36 m~2 m~(-3) at 30°, and those across all growth stages averaged 1.79 m~2 m~(-3) at 0° and 1.52 m~2 m~(-3) at 30°. The absolute percent errors of PAI at each growth stage ranged from 1.8% to 66.1% at 0° and from 4.3% to 23.2% at 30°, and those across all growth stages averaged 30.4% at 0° and 14.8% at 30°. The degree of laser beam coverage of the canopy (expressed as index Ω) explained these errors. From the estimates of PAD at 30°, regressions between the areas of stems, leaves, and ears per unit ground area and actual dry weights gave standard errors of 7.9 g m~(-2) for ears and 12.2 g m~(-2) for stems and leaves.
机译:我们使用高分辨率便携式扫描激光雷达,轻型镜子和基于体素的冠层轮廓分析方法来估计不同生长阶段的水稻冠层的垂直植物面积密度(PAD)轮廓。为了提高激光对密集冠层的穿透力,我们使用了镜子将激光束的方向从水平更改为垂直(0°)和偏离垂直(30°)。 PAD和植物面积指数(PAI)的估计值在30°时比在0°时更准确。 PAD在每个生长阶段的均方根误差在0°时为1.04至3.33 m〜2 m〜(-3),在30°时为0.42至2.36 m〜2 m〜(-3),并且在所有生长期,0°时平均1.79 m〜2 m〜(-3),30°时平均1.52 m〜2 m〜(-3)。在每个生长阶段,PAI的绝对百分比误差在0°时从1.8%到66.1%,在30°时从4.3%到23.2%,而在所有生长阶段,PAI的绝对误差在3°时平均为30.4%,在30°时平均为14.8%。冠层的激光束覆盖程度(表示为指标Ω)解释了这些错误。根据30°PAD的估计值,单位地面面积的茎,叶和耳朵的面积与实际干重之间的回归得出,耳朵的标准误差为7.9 gm〜(-2),而耳朵的标准误差为12.2 gm〜(-2)。茎和叶。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号