首页> 外文期刊>International tax and public finance >Safe haven or earnings stripping rules: a prisoner's dilemma?
【24h】

Safe haven or earnings stripping rules: a prisoner's dilemma?

机译:安全港或剥夺收入的规则:囚徒的困境?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Multinational firms use internal debt financing to shift profits from high-tax to low-tax countries. Therefore, governments restrict the deductibility of interest expenses by applying thin-capitalization rules (TCRs). TCRs fall into two main categories: safe haven rules (SHR) and earnings stripping rules (ESR). We analyze the optimal TCR choice in a two-country tax competition model. We show that unilateral replacement of SHR by ESR imposes a negative profit shifting externality on the other country. This effect can explain the recently observed switch from SHR to ESR in many countries. However, ESR may be a dominant strategy even when SHR is socially optimal, i.e., the observed policies of ESR implementation may indicate a prisoner's dilemma.
机译:跨国公司利用内部债务融资将利润从高税国家转移到低税国家。因此,政府通过应用瘦资本化规则(TCR)限制了利息费用的可抵扣性。 TCR分为两大类:安全港规则(SHR)和剥夺收入规则(ESR)。我们分析了两国税收竞争模型中的最佳TCR选择。我们表明,用ESR单方面替代SHR会对另一个国家带来不利的利润转移外部性。这种影响可以解释最近在许多国家从SHR转向ESR的情况。但是,即使SHR在社会上处于最佳状态,ESR仍可能是占主导地位的策略,即,观察到的ESR实施政策可能表明了囚徒的困境。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号