首页> 外文期刊>International Review of Law Computers & Technology >An analysis of the fundamental tensions between copyright and social media: the legal implications of sharing images on Instagram
【24h】

An analysis of the fundamental tensions between copyright and social media: the legal implications of sharing images on Instagram

机译:版权和社交媒体之间的基本矛盾分析:在Instagram上共享图像的法律含义

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Copyright is inherently intertwined with the development of technology and none more so than the advent of the Internet and sharing technologies. More recently, social media platforms have become the latest challenge for copyright law and policy. This article builds on the literature that recognises the underlying conflict between copyright and social networking sites (SNSs); namely that the basic implication of copyright is the restriction of copying, whereas the ethos of social networking is the promotion of sharing. In particular, this article focuses on the disparity between the restricted acts of copying and communication to the public under copyright law and the encouragement of sharing on SNS Instagram. In doing so, it contextualises the debate surrounding copyright and social media and provides an understanding of the legal implications of using Instagram. As such this paper analyses (1) the infringement of copyright protected work on Instagram, and (2) the user-agreement and licensfng of copyright material on Instagram. This study concludes that the disparity between the principles of copyright and social media lead to confusion and vulnerability of users. Therefore, it is suggested that Instagram should better inform its users of the implications of sharing third-party content as well as the terms of its user agreement. This could be done by implementing a copyright strategy, which includes a notice and takedown system as well as investing in producing educational content for users. Perhaps SNSs, such as Instagram might be more motivated to take steps to recognise intellectual property rights if they were considered Internet Services Provides such as YouTube.
机译:版权在本质上与技术的发展息息相关,而互联网和共享技术的出现则无非如此。最近,社交媒体平台已成为版权法和政策的最新挑战。本文以认识版权和社交网站(SNS)之间潜在冲突的文献为基础;也就是说,版权的基本含义是复制的限制,而社交网络的精神是促进共享。尤其是,本文重点关注版权法下向公众复制和传播的受限制行为与鼓励在SNS Instagram上共享之间的差异。在此过程中,它结合了围绕版权和社交媒体的辩论,并提供了使用Instagram的法律含义的理解。因此,本文分析了(1)对Instagram上受版权保护的作品的侵权行为,以及(2)对Instagram上的版权材料的用户同意和许可。这项研究得出的结论是,版权和社交媒体原则之间的差异导致了用户的困惑和脆弱性。因此,建议Instagram应该更好地告知其用户有关共享第三方内容的含义以及其用户协议的条款。这可以通过实施版权策略来实现,其中包括一个通知和删除系统,以及投资为用户制作教育内容。如果将Instagram等SNS视为互联网服务提供商(例如YouTube),他们可能会更有动力采取步骤来承认知识产权。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号