首页> 外文期刊>International Politics >'Remember Iraq!' Learning theory and the 2013 non-decision on air strikes against Syria
【24h】

'Remember Iraq!' Learning theory and the 2013 non-decision on air strikes against Syria

机译:“记得伊拉克!”学习理论与2013年反对叙利亚的空袭非决定

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Statesmen sometimes seek to legitimize contemporary foreign policy decisions by referring to a 'historical lesson', derived from an allegedly analogous situation in the past. According to foreign policy learning theory, such lessons may also be decisive for the actual decisions. Learning theory is here being tested against four national decision processes in August-September 2013 regarding air strikes against Syria. The four countries participated militarily in the March 2003 Iraq intervention. The latter being defined as reasonably 'similar' to the Syria project and also as a failure, learning theory expects the 10-year-old memory to decisively restrain their 2013 decisions. Was this really the case, or were the countries driven more by, for example, contemporary 2013 concerns focusing at the situation in and around Syria? The theoretical expectation turns out to be fulfilled in the USA, the UK, and Poland, but is disappointed regarding Denmark, where a rivalling lesson, i.a., proved stronger.
机译:政治家有时会通过提及过去的“历史课程”来促进当代外交政策决定,从过去涉嫌类似的情况。根据外交政策学习理论,这些课程也可能对实际决定决定性。学习理论在这里测试了2013年8月至9月的四个国家决策过程,有关对叙利亚的空袭。四个国家在2003年3月的伊拉克干预方面参加了军事化。后者被定义为叙利亚项目的合理性“类似”,也是一个失败,学习理论期望10岁的记忆果断地摧毁了2013年的决定。这种情况真的是这种情况,或者是各国更多地驱动,例如,2013年度当代关注叙利亚及其周围地区的担忧?理论期望在美国,英国和波兰履行,但对丹麦感到失望,在那里竞争课程,即,证明了更强的课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号