...
首页> 外文期刊>International Politics >Theoretical rigor and the study of contemporary cases: explaining post-cold war China-Russia relations
【24h】

Theoretical rigor and the study of contemporary cases: explaining post-cold war China-Russia relations

机译:理论严谨与当代案例研究 - 解释冷战后中国与俄罗斯关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

It has been widely noted that China and Russia have grown progressively closer over the last two decades. Although the scholarly literature has offered detailed descriptions and various ad hoc explanations of this trend, the Sino-Russian bilateral relationship has been the subject of very little scrutiny using rigorous theory, which has obstructed hypothesis formation and evaluation. Moreover, the cooperative post-Cold War trend in the bilateral relationship seems puzzling for baseline versions of each of the major paradigms of international relations theory: realism, constructivism and liberalism. For realists, China's rising power, coupled with its geographic proximity and longstanding border disputes with Russia, made it a present and growing threat to Russian security at the end of the Cold War. Why did China's rise not incur balancing from Russia and increasing bilateral hostility, rather than reconciliation? For constructivists, the stark differences in political ideologies and national cultures, as well as a long history of antagonism, presaged continued post-Cold War animosity. How have these historical animosities and ideological rifts been mitigated or overcome? Finally, both countries were increasingly integrated into the US-led international order immediately following the Cold War, with relatively low interdependence in their bilateral relationship. From a liberal perspective, why did this not prompt the two countries to improve political relations with the West while holding each other at arm's length? The papers in this special issue develop and apply nuanced theoretical arguments to derive testable hypotheses for the cooperative trend in China-Russia relations. In contrast to existing scholarship, these papers offer generalizable insights that both improve our understanding of a crucially important contemporary case, while also advancing IR theory in substantial ways.
机译:众所周知,中国和俄罗斯在过去二十年中逐渐变得越来越多。虽然学术文学提供了详细的描述和各种特征的解释这一趋势,但中俄双边关系一直是利用严格理论审查的极点审查的主题,这阻塞了假设形成和评估。此外,双边关系中的合作后冷战趋势似乎令人困惑的国际关系理论主要范例的基线版本:现实主义,建构主义和自由主义。对于现实主义者来说,中国的崛起力量与俄罗斯的地理邻近和长期的边界争议相结合,使其在冷战结束时对俄罗斯安全的威胁越来越大。为什么中国的崛起不受俄罗斯的平衡,并增加双边敌意,而不是和解?对于建构主义者来说,政治意识形态和民族文化的显着差异,以及对抗的悠久历史,观察了持续的冷战后战争敌意。这些历史狂热如何和思想裂谷被减轻或克服?最后,两国越来越多地融入了冷战之后立即纳入美国领导的国际秩序,在双边关系中相对较低。从自由主义的角度来看,为什么这不促使两国改善与西方的政治关系,同时彼此在手臂的长度举行?本特别问题的论文制定并应用细微的理论论点,以获得中国 - 俄罗斯关系的合作趋势的可测试假设。与现有奖学金相比,这些论文提供了可宽大的见解,以便改善我们对一定重要的当代案例的理解,同时也以实质性方式推进IR理论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号