首页> 外文期刊>Review of International Political Economy >The political economy of family policy expansion Fostering neoliberal capitalism or promoting gender equality supporting social reproduction?
【24h】

The political economy of family policy expansion Fostering neoliberal capitalism or promoting gender equality supporting social reproduction?

机译:扩大家庭政策的政治经济学培育新自由主义资本主义还是促进支持社会再生产的性别平等?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article presents a new theoretical and empirical approach to understand family policy expansion in relation to the political economy of welfare state retrenchment and social reproduction in 23 OECD countries. From a Polanyian perspective, this expansion can be interpreted as a movement toward commodification and liberalization, and a countermovement of gender liberation. The first movement seems to characterize family policy expansion as a tool to foster neoliberal capitalism and the advent of a Schumpeterian Workfare State, conspiring with welfare state retrenchment to encourage employment within an environment of growing precarization. The second movement appears to assuage the social reproduction crisis. This countermovement seems to act as a cushion to soften the shift from a male income earner toward a dual earner model, supporting working parents in meeting escalating childare costs. Looking at the expansion of childcare spending and the retrenchment of minimum income guarantees for couples with children, an empirical illustration of this concomitant 'double movement' reveals that the first holds sway over the second in most countries. Furthermore, household income and maternal levels of education impact on childcare usage, magnifying the negative distributional consequences of cutting minimum income guarantees in favor of childcare.
机译:本文介绍了一种新的理论和实证方法,以了解与23个经合组织国家的福利国家紧缩和社会再生产的政治经济相关的家庭政策扩张。从波兰尼的角度来看,这种扩张可以解释为向商品化和自由化的运动,是对性别解放的反动。第一个运动似乎将扩大家庭政策作为一种特征,以促进新自由主义资本主义和建立熊彼特工作福利国家,并与福利国家的裁员密谋,以鼓励在日趋危险的环境中就业。第二运动似乎缓解了社会再生产危机。这种反动似乎起到了缓冲作用,减轻了从男性收入者向双重收入者模式的转变,支持在职父母应付不断上升的育儿费用。从育儿支出的增长和对有子女的夫妇的最低收入保证金的缩减来看,这种伴随着“双重运动”的经验说明表明,在大多数国家中,第一个运动超过第二个运动。此外,家庭收入和孕产妇的教育水平对保育的使用产生影响,扩大了削减最低限度收入保障以支持育儿的负面分配后果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号