首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of urban and regional research >Family or Money? The False Dilemma in Property Dispossession in Shanghai
【24h】

Family or Money? The False Dilemma in Property Dispossession in Shanghai

机译:家庭还是钱?上海财产处置的虚假困境

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article examines the lived experiences of property dispossession caused by the World Expo 2010 in Shanghai. Specifically, it examines the category of the family, which is overlooked in the existing literature, and probes into the political production of family conflicts and breakdowns. It characterizes the prevailing regime of dispossession in contemporary China as decentralized legal authoritarianism and argues that the organization of the Expo-induced dispossession deviated from this because of the distinctive state structures involved. For this reason, tensions within the state apparatus were temporarily suspended, leading to reduced opportunity for resistance. The state's monopoly of symbolic production rendered contesting claims to property ownership illegitimate and made monetary compensation the only option. This turned confrontation with the state into domestic disputes. Organized as a state-led project, dispossession also exploited displacees' past experiences of a caring' state or state terror, giving rise to different attitudes towards displacement and thus causing more family disputes. Moreover, mobilization of the entire state apparatus also permitted the use of coercive and violent means without legal and moral concerns. Tactics that manipulated, and in some cases completely severed, relations within and beyond the displaced families are explored in depth. The article concludes with a call to change the ways that dispossession has been conceived and conducted in practice.
机译:本文考察了由2010年上海世博会引起的财产剥夺的现实经验。具体而言,它研究了现有文献中忽视的家庭类别,并探讨了家庭冲突和破裂的政治产生。它把当代中国占统治地位的剥夺制度描述为分散的法律威权主义,并认为由于世博会所涉及的独特国家结构,导致世博会剥夺财产的组织背离了这一组织。由于这个原因,状态设备内的张力被暂时中止,导致抵抗的机会减少。国家对象征性生产的垄断使对财产所有权的主张不合法,并使货币补偿成为唯一选择。与国家的对抗变成了国内纠纷。作为国家主导的项目组织的剥夺,也剥夺了流离失所者过去关怀国家或国家恐怖的经历,引起了人们对流离失所的不同态度,从而引发了更多家庭纠纷。此外,动员整个国家机构还允许使用强制和暴力手段,而没有法律和道义上的顾虑。深入探讨了操纵,有时甚至完全切断流离失所家庭内部和外部关系的策略。本文最后呼吁改变在实践中构思和实施剥夺的方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号