...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Testing >The Dutch Review Process for Evaluating the Quality of Psychological Tests: History, Procedure, and Results
【24h】

The Dutch Review Process for Evaluating the Quality of Psychological Tests: History, Procedure, and Results

机译:荷兰评估心理测验质量的审查程序:历史,程序和结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article describes the 2009 revision of the Dutch Rating System for Test Quality and presents the results of test ratings from almost 30 years. The rating system evaluates the quality of a test on seven criteria: theoretical basis, quality of the testing materials, comprehensiveness of the manual, norms, reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity. The update concentrated on two main issues. First, the texts of all criteria were adapted to apply to both paper-and-pencil tests and computer-based tests. Second, the items and the recommendations with respect to the seven criteria were extended to include new developments. The most important extensions are item response theory for test development, continuous norming, domain-referenced interpretation and criterion-referenced interpretation, and the use of non-traditional, modern types of reliability estimation. Longitudinal results show a steady increase of average test quality, but the quality of the norms and the (lack of) research on criterion validity still appear to be a matter of concern.
机译:本文介绍了2009年荷兰测试质量评级系统的修订版,并介绍了近30年的测试评级结果。评分系统根据七个标准评估测试的质量:理论基础,测试材料的质量,手册的全面性,规范,可靠性,构造效度和标准效度。更新集中在两个主要问题上。首先,所有标准的案文都经过修改,以适用于纸笔测试和基于计算机的测试。第二,关于七个标准的项目和建议已扩展到包括新的发展。最重要的扩展是用于测试开发的项目响应理论,连续规范,域参考解释和标准参考解释,以及使用非传统的现代类型的可靠性估计。纵向结果显示平均测试质量稳步提高,但规范质量和标准有效性研究的(缺乏)研究仍然值得关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号