首页> 外文期刊>International journal of technoethics >Environmental Public Goods Not Securable by Markets or Networks: A Partial Response to Scruton and lannone
【24h】

Environmental Public Goods Not Securable by Markets or Networks: A Partial Response to Scruton and lannone

机译:市场或网络无法保障的环境公共物品:对斯克鲁顿和兰尼酮的部分反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Roger Scruton and others argue that market-based approaches and voluntary civic organizations can solve many environmental problems. The author argues in response that there are significant limitations to quota systems and similar market fixes, while NGOs and civil society “networks” are not effective in overcoming certain kinds of collective action problems. Even when they work to some extent, network-based solutions such as certification schemes or charity ownership of lands may also cause new problems, such as trends towards excessive concentrations of power, unhealthy dependencies, and lack of choice about which groups act as guardians of our interests.
机译:罗杰·斯克鲁顿(Roger Scruton)等人认为,基于市场的方法和自愿性民间组织可以解决许多环境问题。作者认为,配额制度和类似的市场定位存在很大的局限性,而非政府组织和民间社会的“网络”在克服某些类型的集体行动问题上无效。即使在某种程度上起作用,基于网络的解决方案(例如认证计划或土地的慈善所有权)也可能引起新的问题,例如权力过度集中,不健康依赖以及缺乏选择哪个团体充当监护人的趋势。我们的利益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号