首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research & Method in Education >Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project
【24h】

Socially just research for social justice: negotiating consent and safety in a participatory action research project

机译:社会公正的社会公正研究:在参与性行动研究项目中协商同意和安全

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This contribution explores what it means to pursue equality and social justice through equitable and just collaborative research methodologies, with a particular focus on two issues: the creation of safe spaces for research participants in the context of a ‘dangerous’ research topic, and the generation of ethically viable research consent. The data analysed is based on an extended self‐study of the ethical issues arising during the No Outsiders project, a participatory action research project investigating approaches to lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) equalities in English primary schools. While we had no particular difficulty securing permissions to conduct the research, our experiences throughout the two and a half year‐long project and the debates they generated have suggested that ethical issues emerge within a community as part of the research practice and are better addressed through ongoing discussion than through an external evaluation of potential risk. Further, the insistence on protecting participants through anonymity, while serving an institutional need for litigation protection, can restrict participant agency.View full textDownload full textKeywordsethics, qualitative methods, designRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713
机译:这项贡献探讨了通过公平和公正的合作研究方法追求平等与社会正义的意义,并特别关注两个问题:在“危险”研究主题的背景下为研究参与者创建安全的空间,并产生具有道德可行性的研究同意书。分析的数据基于对“无局外人”项目期间出现的道德问题的扩展自我研究,该项目是一项参与式行动研究项目,旨在研究英语小学中男女同性恋,双性恋和变性者(LGBT)平等的方法。尽管我们没有特别的困难来获得进行研究的许可,但是我们在整个两年半的项目中所经历的经验以及他们引发的辩论表明,伦理问题作为研究实践的一部分在社区内部出现,并且可以得到更好的解决。通过持续的讨论,而不是通过对潜在风险的外部评估。此外,坚持通过匿名性保护参与者的需求,同时满足机构对诉讼保护的需求,可能会限制参与者的代理机构。查看全文下载全文关键词道德,定性方法,designRelated var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,美味,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2010.511713

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号