首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research & Method in Education >The use of national data sets to baseline science education reform: exploring value-added approaches
【24h】

The use of national data sets to baseline science education reform: exploring value-added approaches

机译:在国家基础科学教育改革中使用国家数据集:探索增值方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper uses data from the National Pupil Database to investigate the differences in ‘performance’ across the range of science courses available following the 2006 Key Stage 4 (KS4) science reforms in England. This is a value-added exploration (from Key Stage 3 [KS3] to KS4) aimed not at the student or the school level, but rather at that of the course. Different methodological approaches to carrying out such an analysis, ranging from simple non-contextualized techniques, to more complex fully contextualized multilevel models, are investigated and their limitations and benefits are evaluated. Important differences between courses are found in terms of the typical ‘value’ they add to the students studying them with particular applied science courses producing higher mean KS4 outcomes for the same KS3 level compared with other courses. The implications of the emergence of such differences, in a context where schools are judged to a great extent on their value-added performance, are discussed. The relative importance of a variety of student characteristics in determining KS4 outcomes are also investigated. Substantive findings are that across all types of course, science prior attainment at KS3, rather than that of mathematics or English, is the most important predictor of KS4 performance in science, and that students of lower socio-economic status consistently make less progress over KS4 than might be expected, despite prior attainment being accounted for in the modelling.View full textDownload full textKeywordsscience education, national data, curriculum reform, value-addedRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.609544
机译:本文使用来自国家学生数据库的数据来调查在2006年英格兰第四阶段关键科学(KS4)科学改革之后,所有可用科学课程中“绩效”的差异。这是一项增值探索(从关键阶段3 [KS3]到KS4),其目标不是针对学生或学校,而是针对该课程。从简单的非上下文化技术到更复杂的完全上下文化的多级模型,研究了进行这种分析的不同方法,并评估了它们的局限性和益处。在课程之间存在重要的差异,这是根据他们在使用特定应用科学课程学习的学生中获得的典型“价值”而得出的,与其他课程相比,在相同的KS3水平下产生更高的平均KS4结果。在很大程度上评估学校的增值绩效的背景下,讨论了这种差异的产生所带来的影响。还研究了各种学生特征在确定KS4结果中的相对重要性。实质性发现是,在所有类型的课程中,KS3而不是数学或英语的科学优先成绩是衡量KS4在科学方面表现的最重要指标,并且社会经济地位较低的学生始终比KS4进步更少尽管在建模中考虑了事先取得的成就,但是超出了预期。查看全文下载全文关键字科学教育,国家数据,课程改革,增值相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”,services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes ,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布号:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2011.609544

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号