首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Research in Marketing >Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods
【24h】

Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods

机译:购买有机产品的意愿:美德和副食品之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Faced with growing environmental problems, food safety issues, and increasing obesity rates, many consumers desire healthier, less processed natural foods that are less harmful to the environment. Yet organic foods only partially benefit from this market environment, and their market share remains quite low despite high growth rates. The usual explanation for this discrepancy is that consumers are not willing to pay the price premium prompted by an organic claim. In this paper, we explore the reasons behind consumers' (un) willingness to pay for organic food and investigate whether it differs between virtue and vice food categories. The results indicate that in vice food categories, organic claims are associated with lower quality, which seems to be only partly compensated by higher prosocial benefits. The lower-quality perceptions translate into a decreased consumer willingness to pay (WTP). We supplement the empirical results with data on organic purchases in the Dutch food market. These data show that market shares of organic food are indeed lower for vice categories of organic food.
机译:面对日益严重的环境问题,食品安全问题和肥胖率的上升,许多消费者希望获得更健康,加工量更少,对环境危害较小的天然食品。然而,有机食品仅部分受益于这种市场环境,尽管增长率很高,它们的市场份额仍然很低。对于这种差异的通常解释是,消费者不愿意支付自然索赔所引起的价格溢价。在本文中,我们探讨了消费者(不)愿意购买有机食品的原因,并调查了美德和副食品类别之间有机食品是否有所不同。结果表明,在副食品类别中,有机声称与较低的质量有关,这似乎仅能通过较高的亲社会利益得到部分补偿。较低质量的感知会导致消费者的支付意愿(WTP)下降。我们用荷兰食品市场有机采购的数据来补充实证结果。这些数据表明,有机食品的副食品类别的有机食品的市场份额确实较低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号