首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education >Professional movements, local appropriations, and the limits of educational critique: the cultural production of mixed messages at an urban middle school
【24h】

Professional movements, local appropriations, and the limits of educational critique: the cultural production of mixed messages at an urban middle school

机译:专业运动,地方拨款和教育评论的局限性:城市中学混合信息的文化产生

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Although critical ethnographers have explored in some depth the ways that social critique informs how youth assess their schooling experiences, the implications of social critique by educators themselves have been of much less interest. Yet, numerous professional educational movements have been wrought from social critique or, at the very least, from critique of school practices that fail to contribute to more equitable social outcomes. Featuring one middle-school classroom contextualized by such movements in the field of education, this article presents an analysis of student appropriations of the messages embedded in a year-long community service-learning project. The project engaged students in democratic action framed by the question: Do our voices count? It is argued that while students embraced a newfound political agency through this work, the lack of opportunity to question individualism, the structural dimensions of urban poverty and their own relative privilege in the school ultimately produced social divisions rather than social critique.
机译:尽管重要的民族志研究者已经深入探讨了社会批判如何告知青年如何评估其就学经历的方法,但教育者自身对社会批判的含义却兴趣不大。然而,社会批评或至少起因于对有助于更公平的社会成果作出贡献的学校实践的批评,促成了许多专业教育运动。本文以在教育领域中这种运动为背景的一所中学教室为特色,对学生在长达一年的社区服务学习项目中嵌入的消息的使用进行了分析。该项目让学生参与民主行动,其提出的问题是:我们的声音重要吗?有人认为,尽管学生通过这项工作接受了新成立的政治机构,但缺乏质疑个人主义,城市贫困的结构性维度以及他们在学校中的相对特权的机会最终导致了社会分裂而不是社会批判。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号