首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Trust, good governance and unethical actions in Finnish public administration
【24h】

Trust, good governance and unethical actions in Finnish public administration

机译:芬兰公共行政部门的信任,善政和不道德行为

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to present an empirical study and contribute to the discussionrnof administrative ethics and integrity by investigating three ethical issues, namely trust, goodrngovernance and unethical actions in the Finnish public administration.rnDesign/methodology/approach - The evidence of this research is based on empirical data from arnNational Citizen Survey implemented in 2008 by the University of Vaasa. The questionnaire was sentrnto 5,000 Finnish citizens and the response rate was 40.4 percent.rnFindings - The strength of the Finnish society concerning trust is that the citizens feel confident inrnpublic sector organizations and societal institutions. Even though serious corruption cases havernremained few in Finland, there is still work to do in order to keep the situation under control. Ignorantrnand bad treatment of citizens occurs mostly in individual service encounters, it does not reflect thernwhole of the ethics of administration.rnResearch limitations/implications - Further research is needed in order to investigate thernsocietal background factors that can explain the different findings from the research questions. Alsornfurther research is required for comparing the results of different countries.rnPractical implications - Strengths and weaknesses are identified as a tool for further research andrnfor the work for practitioners.rnOriginality/value - The core contribution of the paper is a contribution to knowledge concerningrncitizens' perceptions of trust, good governance and unethical actions in an egalitarian society.
机译:目的-本文的目的是提出实证研究,并通过调查芬兰公共行政管理中的三个道德问题,即信任,善治和不道德行为,为讨论行政道德和诚信做出贡献。设计/方法/方法-证据这项研究基于Vaasa大学于2008年实施的“全国公民调查”的经验数据。调查问卷已发送给5,000名芬兰公民,答复率为40.4%。rn结果-芬兰社会在信任方面的优势在于,公民对公共部门组织和社会机构充满信心。尽管在芬兰很少发生严重的腐败案件,但仍需努力使局势得到控制。对公民的无知和恶劣对待大多发生在个人服务中,这并不反映整个行政伦理。研究限制/含义-需要进一步的研究,以研究可以解释研究问题不同结论的社会背景因素。还需要进行进一步的研究以比较不同国家的结果。实践意义-优点和缺点被确定为进一步研究的工具和针对从业者的工作。原创性/价值-论文的核心贡献是对关于公民看法的知识的贡献平等社会中的信任,善政和不道德行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号