首页> 外文期刊>International journal of public sector management >Principles of performance dialogue in public administration
【24h】

Principles of performance dialogue in public administration

机译:公共行政中绩效对话的原则

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The literature acknowledges the importance of interpretative processes, discussion, and organizational learning in public performance management, but a knowledge gap remains concerning the mechanism of performance dialogue. To fill this gap, the purpose of this paper is to study the principles of performance dialogue and collaborative performance management in public administration. Design/methodology/approach - The study utilizes a longitudinal research setting and analyzes the evolution of performance management practices in one city organization in Finland. Findings - The study suggests that performance dialogue needs to be integrated with management practices and explains how this can be done. Three guiding principles of performance dialogue and collaborative performance management are derived. These underline the role of "referees of the information game", a supportive and encouraging environment and a focus on the use of performance information. Practical implications - Performance information is too often provided as a back-office function, and dialogue with information users is either completely lacking or somehow disturbed. The performance dialogue provides a platform for collaborative sense making and helps managers to better understand the complex phenomena and processes they are responsible for. Originality/value - The literature dealing specifically with the change from centralized and vertical performance management practices toward decentralized and horizontal practices is still scarce. This paper provides a new perspective on management control and organizational learning in public administration based on performance dialogue.
机译:目的-文献承认解释性过程,讨论和组织学习在公共绩效管理中的重要性,但是在绩效对话机制方面仍然存在知识空白。为了填补这一空白,本文的目的是研究公共行政中绩效对话和协作绩效管理的原则。设计/方法/方法-该研究利用纵向研究背景,并分析了芬兰一个城市组织中绩效管理实践的演变。调查结果-该研究表明绩效对话需要与管理实践相结合,并说明如何做到这一点。得出了绩效对话和协作绩效管理的三个指导原则。这些强调了“信息游戏裁判员”的作用,一个令人鼓舞和支持的环境以及对表演信息使用的重视。实际意义-绩效信息通常作为后台功能提供,与信息用户的对话要么完全缺乏,要么以某种方式受到干扰。绩效对话为协作感官提供了一个平台,并帮助管理人员更好地理解他们负责的复杂现象和过程。原创性/价值-专门针对从集中和垂直绩效管理实践向分散和水平实践转变的文献还很少。本文提供了基于绩效对话的公共行政管理控制和组织学习的新视角。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号